• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Development of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy for the care of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death following the removal of life support.

作者信息

DeVita M A, Snyder J V

机构信息

Montifiore University Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):131-43. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0175.

DOI:10.1353/ken.0.0175
PMID:10126526
Abstract

In the mid 1980s it was apparent that the need for organ donors exceeded those willing to donate. Some University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) physicians initiated discussion of possible new organ donor categories including individuals pronounced dead by traditional cardiac criteria. However, they reached no conclusion and dropped the discussion. In the late 1980s and the early 1990s, four cases arose in which dying patients or their families requested organ donation following the elective removal of mechanical ventilation. Controversy surrounding these cases precipitated open discussion of the use of organ donors pronounced dead on the basis of cardiac criteria. Prolonged deliberations by many committees in the absence of precedent ultimately resulted in what is, to our knowledge, the country's first policy for organ donation following elective removal of life support. The policy is intricate and conservative. Care was taken to include as many interested parties as possible in an effort to achieve representative and broad based support. This paper describes the development of the UPMC policy on non-heart-beating organ donation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Development of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy for the care of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death following the removal of life support.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):131-43. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0175.
2
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy and procedure manual. Management of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):A1-15.
3
Are the patients who become organ donors under the Pittsburgh protocol for "non-heart-beating donors" really dead?
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):167-78. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0081.
4
Policy issues in a non-heart-beating donor protocol.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):241-50. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0098.
5
Conflict of interest in the procurement of organs from cadavers following withdrawal of life support.撤除生命支持后从尸体获取器官过程中的利益冲突。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):179-87. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0109.
6
Procuring organs from a non-heart-beating cadaver: a case report.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Dec;3(4):371-85. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0115.
7
"An ignoble form of cannibalism": reflections on the Pittsburgh protocol for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadavers.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):231-9. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0070.
8
Statutory definitions of death and the management of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):145-55. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0025.
9
The telltale heart: public policy and the utilization of non-heart-beating donors.泄密的心:公共政策与非心脏跳动供体的利用
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):251-62. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0125.
10
Back to the future: obtaining organs from non-heart-beating cadavers.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):103-11. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0120.

引用本文的文献

1
Donation After Circulatory Death following Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatments. Are We Ready to Break the Dead Donor Rule?撤除生命维持治疗后的循环性死亡捐献。我们准备好打破死亡供体规则了吗?
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun;22(2):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10382-8. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
The History of Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD): Backlash and Boomerang.循环性死亡后器官捐献(DCD)的历史:强烈反对与事与愿违
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Jan 30. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01919-7.
3
Controversy in the Determination of Death: The Definition and Moment of Death.
死亡判定中的争议:死亡的定义与时刻
Linacre Q. 2019 Nov;86(4):366-380. doi: 10.1177/0024363919876393. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
4
How (not) to think of the 'dead-donor' rule.如何(不)看待“死亡供体”规则。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2018 Feb;39(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11017-018-9432-5.
5
A few realistic questions raised by organ retrieval in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中器官获取引发的一些现实问题。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S44. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.05.08.
6
Eligibility of patients withheld or withdrawn from life-sustaining treatment to organ donation after circulatory arrest death: epidemiological feasibility study in a French Intensive Care Unit.心跳骤停死亡后进行器官捐献而被保留或撤回生命支持治疗的患者资格:法国重症监护病房的一项流行病学可行性研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Nov 7;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-36.
7
Controversies in defining and determining death in critical care.危重病患者定义和确定死亡方面的争议。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Mar;9(3):164-73. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.12. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
8
Should we allow organ donation euthanasia? Alternatives for maximizing the number and quality of organs for transplantation.我们是否应该允许器官捐献安乐死?为最大化移植器官数量和质量的替代方案。
Bioethics. 2012 Jan;26(1):32-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01811.x. Epub 2010 May 3.
9
Islam and end-of-life practices in organ donation for transplantation: new questions and serious sociocultural consequences.伊斯兰教与器官移植捐赠中的临终实践:新问题与严重的社会文化后果
HEC Forum. 2009 Jun;21(2):175-205. doi: 10.1007/s10730-009-9095-8.
10
Brain death, states of impaired consciousness, and physician-assisted death for end-of-life organ donation and transplantation.脑死亡、意识障碍状态以及为临终器官捐赠与移植而实施的医生协助死亡。
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Nov;12(4):409-21. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9204-0. Epub 2009 May 13.