• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cost-effectiveness of a tobacco 'quit and win' contest in Sweden.

作者信息

Tillgren P, Rosén M, Haglund B J, Ainetdin T, Lindholm L, Holm L E

机构信息

Kronan Health Centre, Sundbyberg, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Policy. 1993 Nov;26(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90077-3.

DOI:10.1016/0168-8510(93)90077-3
PMID:10130845
Abstract

Tobacco is one of the major causes of premature deaths in the world, and any effort to improve the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation is worth while. The costs and effects in years of life saved (YLS) were estimated for a tobacco 'Quit and Win' (Q&W) contest in Sweden. The contest was conducted during the autumn of 1988 and included two strategies: a national mass media strategy and an organizational strategy for Stockholm County. A total of 12,840 people participated in the Q&W contest. The model for analysis included programme effects and programme costs, and the data was presented in (YLS). Both effects and costs were discounted. Data about non-smoking participants after 12 months and the number of spontaneous quitters was based on random samples of participants and of the general population, respectively. The programme costs included intervention as well as evaluation costs, e.g. costs of personnel, campaign materials, distribution, prizes for the contest, rent and administration and overhead costs for the project group and the collaborating organizations. The cost per YLS varied between US$188 and US$1222. The Q&W contest, as a method of helping tobacco users quit, compares favourably with most preventive and treatment programmes, and the method seems to be quite an effective way for society to use scarce resources.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a tobacco 'quit and win' contest in Sweden.
Health Policy. 1993 Nov;26(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90077-3.
2
A model for cost-effectiveness analyses of smoking cessation interventions applied to a Quit-and-Win contest for mothers of small children.一种应用于针对幼儿母亲的戒烟竞赛的戒烟干预措施成本效益分析模型。
Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(5):343-52. doi: 10.1080/14034940510005789.
3
Cost-effectiveness of enhancing a Quit-and-Win smoking cessation program for college students.提高大学生戒烟赢奖计划的成本效益。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1319-1333. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0977-z. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
4
Community-based youth tobacco control interventions: cost effectiveness of the Full Court Press project.基于社区的青少年烟草控制干预措施:“全场紧逼”项目的成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(3):167-76. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200605030-00003.
5
A tobacco quit and win model in the Stockholm cancer prevention programme.斯德哥尔摩癌症预防计划中的戒烟与成功模式。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1992 Aug;1(5):361-6. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199208000-00004.
6
The SmokingPaST Framework: illustrating the impact of quit attempts, quit methods, and new smokers on smoking prevalence, years of life saved, medical costs saved, programming costs, cost effectiveness, and return on investment.吸烟史框架:说明戒烟尝试、戒烟方法和新烟民对吸烟流行率、挽救的预期寿命、节省的医疗费用、规划成本、成本效益和投资回报的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(1):e11-23. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.101014-QUAN-337.
7
[City dwellers' behaviour concerning smoking ten years after joining 'Quit and Win' competition].[加入“戒烟赢挑战”竞赛十年后城市居民的吸烟行为]
Przegl Lek. 2008;65(10):641-4.
8
Cost-effectiveness of the Australian National Tobacco Campaign.澳大利亚全国烟草运动的成本效益
Tob Control. 2008 Dec;17(6):379-84. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.025213. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
9
Implementation and evaluation of a community-sponsored smoking cessation contest.
Am J Health Promot. 1991 Jan-Feb;5(3):200-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-5.3.200.
10
Impact of direct mail as a method to recruit smoking mothers into a "quit and win" contest.直邮作为招募吸烟母亲参加“戒烟赢奖”竞赛的一种方法的影响。
J Health Commun. 2000 Oct-Dec;5(4):293-303. doi: 10.1080/10810730050199114.

引用本文的文献

1
Competitions for smoking cessation.戒烟竞赛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 20;2(2):CD013272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013272.
2
Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking.一个基于社区的帮助女性戒烟研究项目的成本效益
Tob Control. 2005 Feb;14(1):37-42. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005470.
3
International Quit and Win 1996: comparative evaluation study in China and Finland.1996年国际戒烟竞赛:中国与芬兰的比较评估研究
Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):303-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.303.
4
Quit and Win campaigns as a long-term anti-smoking intervention in North Karelia and other parts of Finland.作为一项长期的反吸烟干预措施,在北卡累利阿和芬兰其他地区开展戒烟并获胜运动。
Tob Control. 1999 Summer;8(2):175-81. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.2.175.
5
Cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation therapies. Interpretation of the evidence-and implications for coverage.戒烟疗法的成本效益。证据解读及对医保覆盖范围的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jun;11(6):538-49. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711060-00003.
6
Health and social costs of tobacco use in Ontario, Canada, 1979 and 1988.1979年和1988年加拿大安大略省烟草使用的健康和社会成本。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):81-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.81.