Jt Comm Perspect. 1993 Nov-Dec;13(6):A1-6.
This performance improvement framework incorporates several key assertions: Performance means what is done and how well--what jobs are done to provide health care and how effectively they are carried out. Joint Commission standards manuals are being reorganized to address the most important governance, management, clinical, and support functions. The effect of an organization's performance of these functions is reflected in patient outcomes, in the cost (or efficiency) of its services, and in patients' and others' perceived satisfaction. Patients and others judge the quality of health care based on health outcomes (and sometimes on their experiences with the care process and level of service provided). Patients, purchasers, regulators, and other stakeholders expect and use quantitative/explicit data and qualitative/implicit perceptions to judge quality and value of health care. The framework for improving performance describes a global model for organizations that intend to be diligent, rigorous and effective in their pursuit of excellence. Its three components--external environment, internal environment, and operational improvement methodology--are not a "cookbook" of required activities. Rather, they represent a synthesis of important concepts, organizational characteristics, management techniques, and scientific tools and methods that together make continuous improvement possible. This improvement framework poses major challenges to health care organizations. These challenges include becoming more patient-focused, redesigning care processes, promoting collaborative teamwork, systematically measuring and assessing performance, and encouraging risk-taking and experimentation. Nonetheless, the ability to proactively and effectively manage quality is the only way that organizations will be able to survive and prosper in the face of stringent resource constraints and ever-increasing demands for better health outcomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
绩效意味着做了什么以及做得如何——为提供医疗保健做了哪些工作以及这些工作执行得有多有效。联合委员会标准手册正在进行重组,以涵盖最重要的治理、管理、临床和支持功能。组织在履行这些功能方面的绩效影响体现在患者的治疗结果、服务成本(或效率)以及患者和其他人的感知满意度上。患者和其他人根据健康结果(有时还根据他们在护理过程中的体验以及所提供服务的水平)来评判医疗保健的质量。患者、购买者、监管机构和其他利益相关者期望并使用定量/明确的数据以及定性/隐含的认知来评判医疗保健的质量和价值。绩效改进框架为那些打算在追求卓越方面勤勉、严谨且有效的组织描述了一个全局模型。其三个组成部分——外部环境、内部环境和运营改进方法——并非一系列规定活动的“食谱”。相反,它们代表了重要概念、组织特征、管理技术以及科学工具和方法的综合,这些共同使得持续改进成为可能。这个改进框架给医疗保健组织带来了重大挑战。这些挑战包括更加以患者为中心、重新设计护理流程、促进团队协作、系统地衡量和评估绩效,以及鼓励冒险和试验。尽管如此,积极有效地管理质量的能力是组织在面临严格的资源限制和对更好健康结果的不断增长需求时能够生存和繁荣的唯一途径。(摘要截选至250词)