Kenney G M
Urban Institute, Washington, DC 20037.
Health Care Financ Rev. 1993 Summer;14(4):39-57.
This article addresses whether the use of Medicare home health services differs systematically for rural and urban beneficiaries. It draws on Medicare data bases from 1983, 1985, and 1987, including the Health Insurance Skeleton Write-Off (HISKEW) files and the Home Health Agency (HHA) 40-percent Bill Skeleton files. It presents background information on rural and urban beneficiaries and contrasts the use rates, visit levels and profiles, episodes of home health use, and primary diagnoses in rural and urban areas. The results point to higher home health use rates in urban areas and to a narrowing of the urban-rural use differential from 1983 to 1987. Rural home health users receive on average three more visits than their urban counterparts, with many more skilled nursing and home health aide visits. However, rural enrollees are much less likely than urban enrollees to receive medical social service or therapeutic visits, even after controlling for primary diagnosis. These findings point to the need for further analysis to understand the consequences of these differences.
本文探讨医疗保险家庭健康服务在农村和城市受益人群中的使用是否存在系统性差异。它利用了1983年、1985年和1987年的医疗保险数据库,包括健康保险框架注销(HISKEW)文件和家庭健康机构(HHA)40%账单框架文件。文章介绍了农村和城市受益人的背景信息,并对比了农村和城市地区的使用率、访视水平和概况、家庭健康服务使用情况以及主要诊断。结果表明城市地区的家庭健康服务使用率较高,且1983年至1987年期间城乡使用差异有所缩小。农村家庭健康服务使用者平均比城市使用者多接受三次访视,其中熟练护理和家庭健康助理的访视次数更多。然而,即使在控制了主要诊断之后,农村参保者接受医疗社会服务或治疗性访视的可能性也比城市参保者低得多。这些发现表明需要进一步分析以了解这些差异的影响。