• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Validation of professional licensure examinations. Professions theory, test design, and construct validity.

作者信息

LaDuca A

机构信息

National Board of Medical Examiners.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 1994 Jun;17(2):178-97; discussion 236-41. doi: 10.1177/016327879401700204.

DOI:10.1177/016327879401700204
PMID:10134547
Abstract

Although the unitary view of test validity has gained support recently, it has real limitations where professional licensing examinations are concerned. A strategy for validation of professional licensure tests requires modifying conventional approaches in three ways. First, a theory of professions must be incorporated into the test development process so as to acknowledge the social character of professions. Second, the importance of test design in the validation of licensing tests should be enhanced. Third, the concept of construct validation must be expanded to accommodate the special features of content that inhere to professional licensure testing. Methods for accomplishing these three things are described and the implications of these and other views discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Validation of professional licensure examinations. Professions theory, test design, and construct validity.
Eval Health Prof. 1994 Jun;17(2):178-97; discussion 236-41. doi: 10.1177/016327879401700204.
2
A research agenda for licensing and certification testing validation studies.许可与认证测试验证研究的研究议程
Eval Health Prof. 1994 Jun;17(2):242-56. doi: 10.1177/016327879401700208.
3
Validating interpretive arguments for licensure and certification examinations.验证用于执照和认证考试的解释性论证
Eval Health Prof. 1994 Jun;17(2):133-59; discussion 236-41. doi: 10.1177/016327879401700202.
4
Research on standards for professional licensure and certification examinations.专业执照及认证考试标准研究。
Eval Health Prof. 1994 Jun;17(2):160-77; discussion 236-41. doi: 10.1177/016327879401700203.
5
Pew Health Professions Commission task force releases policy considerations for reforming health care workforce regulation.皮尤健康职业委员会特别工作组发布了关于改革医疗保健劳动力监管的政策考量。
AORN J. 1996 Feb;63(2):343, 346-8.
6
Narratives of construct validation.结构效度的叙述
Eval Health Prof. 1994 Jun;17(2):222-35. doi: 10.1177/016327879401700206.
7
Measurement requisites for competency assurance in the health professions.卫生专业领域能力保证的测量要求。
Eval Health Prof. 1978 Spring;1(1):9-15. doi: 10.1177/016327877800100101.
8
Strengthening the links between the public health community and health professions regulation.加强公共卫生界与卫生专业监管之间的联系。
Public Health Rep. 1999 Sep-Oct;114(5):421-6. doi: 10.1093/phr/114.5.421.
9
Certification and licensing in the allied health professions.联合健康专业的认证与许可。
J Dent Educ. 1972 Aug;36(8):10-6.
10
A comparison of entrance and graduation requirements for the Au.D. with other first professional degrees.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 May;17(5):321-30. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.5.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting physician performance: implications for performance improvement and governance.影响医生绩效的因素:对绩效改进与管理的启示
Healthc Policy. 2009 Nov;5(2):e141-60.