Baker S A
Park Place Medical Center, Mid-Jefferson Hospital, Nederland, TX.
J Clin Eng. 1994 May-Jun;19(3):195-203. doi: 10.1097/00004669-199405000-00012.
In late 1993, a survey was sent to the subscribers of the Journal of Clinical Engineering to determine: (1) if employers were responding to the biohazards protection needs of BMETs and CEs; (2) if personal protective equipment was being utilized; (3) if occupational exposure perceptions and concerns had changed since a previous survey four years ago; and (4) if educational efforts targeting BMETs and CEs were still needed. The 267 respondents were divided into four groups according to certification status and job title. Results showed that employers were doing an excellent job of providing personal protective equipment, but 50% of the BMETs and CEs chose not to use it. Even though though the occupational exposure illness and disability rate increased to 21% from the 1989 survey rate of 18%, BMETs and CEs still feel confident in their abilities to recognize potential biohazard problems based on visual clues, which can be an error in judgement that can lead to serious adverse effects including illness, disability, or death.
1993年末,一份调查问卷被发送给《临床工程杂志》的订阅者,以确定:(1)雇主是否在回应生物医学设备技术员(BMETs)和临床工程师(CEs)的生物危害防护需求;(2)个人防护装备是否得到使用;(3)自四年前的上次调查以来,职业暴露的认知和担忧是否有所变化;以及(4)针对BMETs和CEs的教育工作是否仍然必要。267名受访者根据认证状态和职位头衔被分为四组。结果显示,雇主在提供个人防护装备方面做得很好,但50%的BMETs和CEs选择不使用它。尽管职业暴露疾病和残疾率从1989年调查时的18%上升到了21%,但BMETs和CEs仍然对自己基于视觉线索识别潜在生物危害问题的能力充满信心,而这可能是一种判断错误,可能导致包括疾病、残疾或死亡在内的严重不良后果。