Suppr超能文献

处方保留对药物使用的影响:一项对照试验。

The impact of formulary reservations on drug utilization: a controlled trial.

作者信息

Mather J L, Bayliff C D, Reider M J, Hussain Z, Colby W D

机构信息

Kingston General Hospital, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Jun;47(3):111-6.

Abstract

A controlled trial was conducted in two teaching hospitals (A and B), with similar case mixes to determine the impact of reservations, which were educational in nature, on the utilization of oral ciprofloxacin. Over a two-month period the health records of all the patients who received the drug were reviewed, and information on utilization and demographics of patients receiving the drug was recorded. As well, the number of admissions to the two hospitals over this period were compared. If culture and sensitivity (C & S) results were available, appropriateness was assessed in accordance with criteria for use established at site A; in the absence of C & S information, consensus by two microbiologists was used. Over the two-month period a total of 136 patients received ciprofloxacin at the two institutions. At site A, which had reservations, the number of patients who continued to receive ciprofloxacin upon admission was significantly decreased relative to site B, which did not have reservations (14% vs. 36% respectively, p = .029). As well, when assessed by total number of admissions to the institutions, the number of patients receiving ciprofloxacin at site A was less than site B (1.5% vs. 2.6% respectively, p = .003)). While the utilization was decreased at site A vs. site B, the proportion of patients with therapy deemed to be appropriate was not different between the two sites. Educationally based reservations are an effective formulary tool for optimizing drug utilization.

摘要

在两家教学医院(A医院和B医院)进行了一项对照试验,这两家医院的病例组合相似,以确定具有教育性质的限制措施对口服环丙沙星使用情况的影响。在两个月的时间里,对所有接受该药物治疗的患者的健康记录进行了审查,并记录了接受该药物治疗患者的用药情况和人口统计学信息。此外,还比较了这两家医院在此期间的住院人数。如果有培养和药敏(C&S)结果,则根据A医院制定的使用标准评估用药合理性;在没有C&S信息的情况下,则采用两位微生物学家的共识意见。在这两个月的时间里,两家机构共有136名患者接受了环丙沙星治疗。在设有限制措施的A医院,入院后继续接受环丙沙星治疗的患者人数相对于没有限制措施的B医院显著减少(分别为14%和36%,p = 0.029)。此外,按机构的总入院人数评估时,A医院接受环丙沙星治疗的患者人数少于B医院(分别为1.5%和2.6%,p = 0.003)。虽然A医院与B医院相比用药量有所减少,但两个地点被认为治疗合理的患者比例没有差异。基于教育的限制措施是优化药物使用的一种有效处方工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验