• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从员工团队中获取最大价值——并确保其合法合规。

Getting maximum value from employee teams--and keeping them legal.

作者信息

McConnell C R

机构信息

Genesee Hospital, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

Health Care Superv. 1994 Sep;13(1):66-73.

PMID:10136987
Abstract

Today's increasing emphasis on participative management is tending to bring more employees into problem-solving processes and giving them more voice in how they do their work. As a natural consequence of such changes, more is being done with employee teams. However, in some areas of potential involvement, employee teams can be seen as intruding on the territory of labor unions, so there is a constant risk of a given employee team being ruled an illegal labor organization. This problem, actually existing as long as the National Labor Relations Act has been with us but only recently forced into prominence by the Electromation Decision of late 1992, can be solved through observance of sensible guidelines for team organization and operation.

摘要

如今,对参与式管理的日益重视正促使更多员工参与到问题解决过程中,并让他们在工作方式上拥有更多发言权。作为这些变化的自然结果,员工团队承担了更多工作。然而,在一些可能参与的领域,员工团队可能被视为侵入了工会的领地,因此某个员工团队被判定为非法劳工组织的风险始终存在。这个问题实际上自《国家劳动关系法》颁布以来就一直存在,但直到1992年末的“电子自动化公司案”判决才使其最近凸显出来,可通过遵守关于团队组织和运作的合理准则来解决。

相似文献

1
Getting maximum value from employee teams--and keeping them legal.从员工团队中获取最大价值——并确保其合法合规。
Health Care Superv. 1994 Sep;13(1):66-73.
2
Employee participation programs in the health care industry: are they unlawful under recent labor rulings?
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1995 Spring;40(1):124-37.
3
Employee participation programs after electromation: they're worth the risk!“电子自动化公司案”后的员工参与计划:值得冒此风险!
Ann Health Law. 1993;2:55-66.
4
Employee participation committees: a union in sheep's clothing?员工参与委员会:披着羊皮的工会?
Health Care Law Newsl. 1993 Sep;8(9):7-12.
5
Case study: a hospital labor organization attempt calls for a union prevention education program.
Case Stud Health Adm. 1987;6:60-4; discussion 64-5.
6
An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act.对《塔夫脱-哈特利法案》下员工委员会的“开明”看法。
Employee Relat Law J. 1983;9(3):474-84.
7
The National Labor Relations Act: a potential legal constraint upon quality circles and other employer-sponsored employee committees.《国家劳动关系法》:对质量圈及其他雇主发起的员工委员会的潜在法律限制。
Labor Law J. 1983 Dec;34(12):776-80.
8
Union elections and the NLRB. The healthcare industry continues to challenge bargaining unit determinations.工会选举与美国国家劳资关系委员会。医疗行业继续对谈判单位的确定提出质疑。
Health Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb;71(1):96-101.
9
Perspectives on unionization in hospitals.医院工会化的相关观点。
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1992 Winter;14(3):267-76.
10
Team proposals: jump starts for productivity, quality and employee involvement.团队提案:提升生产力、质量和员工参与度的助推器。
Healthc Hum Resour. 1993 Mar;2(3):3-5.