• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Employee participation programs in the health care industry: are they unlawful under recent labor rulings?

作者信息

Robinson R K, Fink R L, Fink L A

机构信息

Department of Management and Marketing, University of Mississippi, University 38677, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1995 Spring;40(1):124-37.

PMID:10140869
Abstract

Two recent National Labor Relations Board decisions, Electromation and DuPont, may very well be used to declare many health care organizations' employee empowerment and participation programs (including TQM and CQI groups) in violation of U.S. labor laws. This article provides a detailed explanation of the NLRB's two-part inquiry that will now be used to determine whether a health care institution's employee participation programs are under the NLRB's jurisdiction as a labor organization, and if so, whether the institution is engaged in unlawful employer domination. This article will also provide guidance from the NLRB as to what form of employee participation may be permitted under the National Labor Relations Act.

摘要

相似文献

1
Employee participation programs in the health care industry: are they unlawful under recent labor rulings?
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1995 Spring;40(1):124-37.
2
Getting maximum value from employee teams--and keeping them legal.从员工团队中获取最大价值——并确保其合法合规。
Health Care Superv. 1994 Sep;13(1):66-73.
3
Employee participation programs after electromation: they're worth the risk!“电子自动化公司案”后的员工参与计划:值得冒此风险!
Ann Health Law. 1993;2:55-66.
4
Health care institution labor law: case law developments, 1974-78.《医疗机构劳动法:判例法发展,1974 - 1978年》
Am J Law Med. 1978 Spring;4(1):1-14.
5
An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act.对《塔夫脱-哈特利法案》下员工委员会的“开明”看法。
Employee Relat Law J. 1983;9(3):474-84.
6
Employee participation committees: a union in sheep's clothing?员工参与委员会:披着羊皮的工会?
Health Care Law Newsl. 1993 Sep;8(9):7-12.
7
The Fair Labor Standards Act: a potential legal constraint upon quality circles and other employee participation programs.《公平劳动标准法》:对质量圈及其他员工参与计划的潜在法律限制。
Labor Law J. 1986 Apr;37(4):244-9.
8
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
9
Union elections and the NLRB. The healthcare industry continues to challenge bargaining unit determinations.工会选举与美国国家劳资关系委员会。医疗行业继续对谈判单位的确定提出质疑。
Health Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb;71(1):96-101.
10
Are worker participation plans "labor organizations" within the meaning of Section 2(5)?: a proposed framework of analysis.工人参与计划是否属于第2(5)条意义上的“劳工组织”?:一个拟议的分析框架。
Labor Law J. 1985 Apr;36(4):226-37.