• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

服务协调团队对被国家监护儿童结局的影响。

The effect of services coordination teams on outcomes for children in state custody.

作者信息

Glisson C

机构信息

College of Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

出版信息

Adm Soc Work. 1994;18(4):1-23. doi: 10.1300/J147v18n04_01.

DOI:10.1300/J147v18n04_01
PMID:10140227
Abstract

The author describes the results of a quasi-experimental study of the effects of interorganizational services coordination teams on the quality and outcomes of services to children in state custody. The findings suggest that services coordination teams improve access to services and enhance service outcomes. Children served by services coordination teams were more likely to be placed in less restrictive residential settings, more like to be placed in settings appropriate to their levels of psycho-social functioning, and more likely to receive needed services from the state's mental health system. Moreover, those children with the most serious externalizing problem (i.e., aggressive, antisocial) behavior made more progress when served by services coordination teams.

摘要

作者描述了一项准实验研究的结果,该研究探讨了组织间服务协调团队对处于国家监护下儿童的服务质量和结果的影响。研究结果表明,服务协调团队改善了服务获取情况并提升了服务效果。由服务协调团队提供服务的儿童更有可能被安置在限制较少的居住环境中,更有可能被安置在与其心理社会功能水平相适应的环境中,并且更有可能从该州的心理健康系统获得所需服务。此外,那些具有最严重外化问题(即攻击性、反社会)行为的儿童在接受服务协调团队的服务时取得了更大的进步。

相似文献

1
The effect of services coordination teams on outcomes for children in state custody.服务协调团队对被国家监护儿童结局的影响。
Adm Soc Work. 1994;18(4):1-23. doi: 10.1300/J147v18n04_01.
2
Repairing the children's mental health system: what it will take.修复儿童心理健康系统:所需条件。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 2003 Apr;12(2):13-4.
3
Impact of managed care in the public sector: children and adolescents with behavioral health problems and their families.公共部门中管理式医疗的影响:有行为健康问题的儿童、青少年及其家庭。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1998 Jun;7(3):41-6.
4
Child behavioral health service use and caregiver strain: comparison of managed care and fee-for-service Medicaid systems.儿童行为健康服务的使用与照顾者压力:管理式医疗与按服务收费的医疗补助系统之比较
Ment Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;7(4):197-211. doi: 10.1007/s11020-005-7452-z.
5
Introduction of a child and adolescent mental health link worker: education and health staff focus group findings.儿童及青少年心理健康联络专员的引入:教育与卫生工作人员焦点小组的调查结果
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Oct;15(8):670-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01296.x.
6
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck then must it be a rabbit? Programs, systems and a cumulative science of children's mental health services.如果它走路像鸭子,叫声像鸭子,那它一定是只兔子吗?儿童心理健康服务的项目、系统及累积科学。
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Feb;33(1):14-7. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
7
Evolutionary drift in systems of care development.医疗照护发展体系中的进化漂移
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Feb;33(1):21-3. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
8
Practice-based care coordination: a medical home essential.基于实践的医疗协调:医疗之家的必备要素。
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):e723-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1684.
9
How can epidemiology improve mental health services for children and adolescents?流行病学如何改善儿童和青少年的心理健康服务?
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;32(6):1106-14; discussion 1114-7. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199311000-00002.
10
Creating a front porch in systems of care: improving access to behavioral health services for diverse children and families.在照护体系中打造前沿阵地:改善不同儿童及其家庭获得行为健康服务的机会。
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Feb;33(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Partnering for Success: Factors Impacting Implementation of a Cross-Systems Collaborative model Between Behavioral Health and Child Welfare.合作共赢:影响行为健康和儿童福利跨系统合作模式实施的因素。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Sep;48(5):839-856. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01135-5. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Traveling Without a Map: An Incomplete History of the Road to Implementation Science and Where We May Go from Here.无图旅行:通向实施科学之路的不完整历史,以及我们可能从这里走向何方。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Mar;47(2):272-278. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01013-6.
3
Testing the Community-Based Learning Collaborative (CBLC) implementation model: a study protocol.
测试基于社区的学习协作(CBLC)实施模式:一项研究方案。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Aug 18;10:52. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0084-4. eCollection 2016.
4
Mental health services for children placed in foster care: an overview of current challenges.为寄养儿童提供的心理健康服务:当前挑战概述
Child Welfare. 2009;88(1):5-26.
5
State variation in psychotropic medication use by foster care children with autism spectrum disorder.患有自闭症谱系障碍的寄养儿童使用精神药物的州际差异。
Pediatrics. 2009 Aug;124(2):e305-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3713. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
6
Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers, children's service use, and outcomes.儿童福利机构与心理健康服务提供者之间的协调、儿童服务利用情况及结果。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jun;33(6):372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.004. Epub 2009 May 26.
7
Predictors of outpatient mental health service use--the role of foster care placement change.门诊心理健康服务使用的预测因素——寄养安置变化的作用。
Ment Health Serv Res. 2004 Sep;6(3):127-41. doi: 10.1023/b:mhsr.0000036487.39001.51.
8
Comprehensive assessments for children entering foster care: a national perspective.进入寄养家庭儿童的综合评估:国家视角
Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 1):134-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.134.