Suppr超能文献

衡量医疗保健质量。

Measuring the quality of health care.

作者信息

Custer W

机构信息

Custer Economic Research, USA.

出版信息

EBRI Issue Brief. 1995 Mar(159):1-18.

Abstract

This Issue Brief examines some of the issues involved in defining and measuring the quality of health care and in implementing quality measures. It discusses the importance of measures of health care quality in the evolving health care delivery system, examines some of the conceptual issues involved in defining quality of care, and discusses some of the measures of health care quality and how these measures have been implemented in the health care delivery system. The major impetus for quality assurance programs is cost management: it is an attempt to allocate scarce health care resources efficiently. This requires making choices among alternatives, which may mean that maximizing quality of care for whole populations may not maximize the quality of care for individuals. Quality, in terms of any single good or service, has a number of dimensions. Health care is a complex bundle of services, and each component service within an episode of care affects the other components and the patients differently. Moreover, patients differ in numerous ways, which means that similar symptoms may require different services if care is to be effective. Measuring quality of health care services requires accounting for all of these factors. In attempting to manage health care costs, employers and other private health plans have begun to employ process measures of quality, i.e., evaluating caregivers' activities, the decisions made at each step in an episode of illness, and the appropriateness of the care provided. Process is an important component of quality measures because it focuses directly on the uncertainty in the efficacy of treatment. Given this uncertainty, the logic of medical decision making is an important determinant of quality and cost effectiveness. Examining the process of care involves assembling a panel of physicians who review medical records to determine the appropriateness of the care received. Providers have increasingly found that their medical decision making and practice styles are being monitored by purchasers as new health care delivery systems are being formed. The American Medical Association found that 39 percent of surveyed physicians were subject to clinical profiling.

摘要

本问题简报探讨了在界定和衡量医疗保健质量以及实施质量衡量标准方面所涉及的一些问题。它讨论了医疗保健质量衡量标准在不断演变的医疗保健提供系统中的重要性,审视了界定医疗质量所涉及的一些概念性问题,并讨论了一些医疗保健质量衡量标准以及这些标准在医疗保健提供系统中是如何实施的。质量保证计划的主要推动力是成本管理:它试图有效地分配稀缺的医疗保健资源。这需要在多种选择中做出抉择,这可能意味着使全体人群的医疗保健质量最大化并不一定能使个体的医疗保健质量最大化。就任何一种商品或服务而言,质量都有多个维度。医疗保健是一系列复杂的服务,一次护理过程中的每项组成服务对其他组成部分和患者的影响各不相同。此外,患者在很多方面存在差异,这意味着如果要使护理有效,类似的症状可能需要不同的服务。衡量医疗保健服务质量需要考虑所有这些因素。为了控制医疗保健成本,雇主和其他私人健康保险计划已开始采用质量的过程衡量标准,即评估护理人员的活动、疾病治疗过程中每一步所做的决策以及所提供护理的适宜性。过程是质量衡量标准的一个重要组成部分,因为它直接关注治疗效果的不确定性。鉴于这种不确定性,医疗决策的逻辑是质量和成本效益的一个重要决定因素。审查护理过程需要召集一组医生,他们通过查阅病历以确定所接受护理的适宜性。随着新的医疗保健提供系统的形成,医疗服务提供者越来越发现他们的医疗决策和执业方式正受到购买方的监督。美国医学协会发现,接受调查的医生中有39%受到临床剖析。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验