• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全民付费系统下,保险公司应该支付相同的费用吗?

Should insurers pay the same fees under an all-payer system?

作者信息

Kominski G F, Rice T

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, 90024, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 1994 Winter;16(2):175-89.

PMID:10142371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4193492/
Abstract

Medicare's use of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and the resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) has led to interest in developing a national all-payer system in which insurers use the same payment methods and payment rates. Using data for 81 high-volume DRGs from 457 California hospitals, we conclude that a single set of rates for hospital care would not be appropriate. On average, Medicare patients were 11.7 percent more expensive than commercially insured patients, but less expensive in many DRGs. Further research is needed to determine if Medicare patients require more physician resources compared with non-Medicare patients, particularly for surgical procedures.

摘要

医疗保险对诊断相关分组(DRGs)和基于资源的相对价值尺度(RBRVS)的使用引发了人们对建立全国性全支付方系统的兴趣,在该系统中,保险公司采用相同的支付方式和支付费率。利用来自加利福尼亚州457家医院的81个高流量DRG的数据,我们得出结论,单一的一套医院护理费率并不合适。平均而言,医疗保险患者比商业保险患者的费用高出11.7%,但在许多DRG中费用较低。需要进一步研究以确定与非医疗保险患者相比,医疗保险患者是否需要更多的医生资源,特别是在外科手术方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d9/4193492/113b3592909b/hcfr-16-2-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d9/4193492/113b3592909b/hcfr-16-2-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d9/4193492/113b3592909b/hcfr-16-2-175-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Should insurers pay the same fees under an all-payer system?在全民付费系统下,保险公司应该支付相同的费用吗?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1994 Winter;16(2):175-89.
2
Diffusion of Medicare's RBRVS and related physician payment policies.医疗保险的资源基础相对价值尺度(RBRVS)及相关医生支付政策的传播
Health Care Financ Rev. 1994 Winter;16(2):159-73.
3
Use of diagnosis-related groups by non-Medicare payers.非医疗保险支付方对诊断相关分组的使用。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1994 Winter;16(2):127-58.
4
Wide variation in hospital and physician payment rates evidence of provider market power.医院和医生支付费率存在广泛差异,这证明了供应商的市场力量。
Res Brief. 2010 Nov(16):1-11.
5
Rate setting and hospital cost-containment: all-payer versus partial-payer approaches.费率设定与医院成本控制:全付费方与部分付费方方法
Health Serv Res. 1987 Aug;22(3):307-26.
6
Do market fees differ from relative value scale fees? Examining surgeon payments in New Zealand.市场收费与相对价值量表收费是否不同?新西兰外科医生薪酬的调查
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Oct;16(4):203-10. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010028. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
7
Medicare's financial status: how did we get here?医疗保险的财务状况:我们是如何走到这一步的?
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984 Spring;62(2):183-206.
8
Use of the resource-based relative value scale for private insurers.基于资源的相对价值量表在私人保险公司中的应用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Winter;13(5):193-201. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.5.193.
9
An overview of the development and refinement of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. The foundation for reform of U.S. physician payment.基于资源的相对价值量表的发展与完善概述。美国医生薪酬改革的基础。
Med Care. 1992 Nov;30(11 Suppl):NS1-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199211001-00001.
10
Including an all-payer reimbursement system in a universal health insurance program.在全民健康保险计划中纳入全支付方报销系统。
Inquiry. 1992 Summer;29(2):203-12.

引用本文的文献

1
One DRG, one price? The effect of patient condition on price variation within DRGs and across hospitals.一个疾病诊断相关分组,一个价格?患者病情对疾病诊断相关分组内及不同医院间价格差异的影响。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Jun;1(2):111-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1012874527253.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating hospital costs. A multiple-output analysis.估算医院成本:多产出分析
J Health Econ. 1986 Jun;5(2):107-27. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90001-9.
2
Relative incomes and rates of return for U.S. physicians.美国医生的相对收入和回报率。
J Health Econ. 1985 Mar;4(1):63-78. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(85)90024-4.
3
Estimating the indirect costs of teaching.估算教学的间接成本。
J Health Econ. 1992 Aug;11(2):153-71. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90032-v.
4
Should private payers adopt RBRVS fee schedules?私立支付方是否应采用相对价值比率(RBRVS)费用表?
Bus Health. 1992 Nov;10(13):24, 26, 28.
5
Physician response to fee changes with multiple payers.医生对多个支付方费用变化的反应。
J Health Econ. 1991;10(4):385-410. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90022-f.
6
Comparison of alternative weight recalibration methods for diagnosis-related groups.用于诊断相关分组的替代权重重新校准方法的比较
Health Care Financ Rev. 1990 Winter;12(2):87-101.
7
Regulating physician supply: the evolution of British Columbia's Bill 41.调控医生供应:不列颠哥伦比亚省第41号法案的演变
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988 Spring;13(1):1-25. doi: 10.1215/03616878-13-1-1.
8
Using patient age in defining DRGs for Medicare payment.
Inquiry. 1988 Winter;25(4):494-503.
9
The distributional implications of using relative prices in DRG payment systems.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)支付系统中使用相对价格的分配影响。
Inquiry. 1987 Spring;24(1):85-95.
10
Refining DRGs. The example of children's diagnosis-related groups.
Med Care. 1989 May;27(5):491-506.