• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调控医生供应:不列颠哥伦比亚省第41号法案的演变

Regulating physician supply: the evolution of British Columbia's Bill 41.

作者信息

Barer M L

机构信息

University of British Columbia.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988 Spring;13(1):1-25. doi: 10.1215/03616878-13-1-1.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-13-1-1
PMID:3367022
Abstract

This paper traces the development of British Columbia's controversial Bill 41, which empowers that province's Ministry of Health to restrict the issuance of billing numbers entitling physicians to seek payment from the provincial medical services plan. The bill and its predecessors have been the subjects of two court challenges by the medical profession, and the legal battles continue. The bill has also taken on a role in the evolving interpretation of Canada's new Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Meanwhile, the policy appears to be slowing the rate of growth in physician supply in the province, but its impact on the real target--medical care costs--is still uncertain.

摘要

本文追溯了不列颠哥伦比亚省备受争议的第41号法案的发展历程,该法案授权该省卫生部限制发放计费号码,这些号码赋予医生向省级医疗服务计划申请付款的权利。该法案及其前身一直是医疗行业两次法庭质疑的对象,法律斗争仍在继续。该法案在加拿大新的《权利和自由宪章》不断演变的解释中也发挥了作用。与此同时,这项政策似乎正在减缓该省医生供应的增长速度,但其对真正目标——医疗成本——的影响仍不确定。

相似文献

1
Regulating physician supply: the evolution of British Columbia's Bill 41.调控医生供应:不列颠哥伦比亚省第41号法案的演变
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988 Spring;13(1):1-25. doi: 10.1215/03616878-13-1-1.
2
The impact on medical services utilization of British Columbia's 1982/83 physician fee 'giveback': preliminary results.1982/83年不列颠哥伦比亚省医生费用“回馈”对医疗服务利用的影响:初步结果
Can J Public Health. 1987 Jan-Feb;78(1):37-42.
3
Brown v. British Columbia (Minister of Health).布朗诉不列颠哥伦比亚省(卫生部长)案
Dom Law Rep. 1990 Jan 25;66:444-69.
4
Navigating the nexus between British Columbia's public consumption and decriminalization policies of illegal drugs.探索不列颠哥伦比亚省公共消费与非法药物非刑罪化政策之间的关联。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 23;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01150-6.
5
A profile of academic physicians in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省学术医生概况。
Acad Med. 1989 Sep;64(9):524-32.
6
How many physicians does Canada need to care for our aging population?加拿大需要多少医生来照顾我们日益老龄化的人口?
CMAJ. 1998 May 19;158(10):1275-84.
7
Proposed Implementation of Blockchain in British Columbia's Health Care Data Management.区块链在不列颠哥伦比亚省医疗保健数据管理中的应用方案
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e20897. doi: 10.2196/20897.
8
Strong medicine to save Medicare. The Kennedy-Gephardt bill would include physician services under DRGs.拯救医疗保险的猛药。肯尼迪-格普哈特法案将把医生服务纳入诊断相关分组(DRGs)。
Physicians Manage. 1984 Dec;24(12):55-6, 61.
9
Right to bill may affect amount of tobacco counselling by MDs.计费权可能会影响医生提供烟草咨询的数量。
CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):241-3.
10
Re-minding our Ps and Qs: medical cost controls in Canada.牢记我们的注意事项:加拿大的医疗成本控制
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Summer;15(2):216-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.2.216.

引用本文的文献

1
Should insurers pay the same fees under an all-payer system?在全民付费系统下,保险公司应该支付相同的费用吗?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1994 Winter;16(2):175-89.
2
Trends in use of medical services by the elderly in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省老年人医疗服务使用趋势。
CMAJ. 1989 Jul 1;141(1):39-45.
3
Controlling overservicing by physicians: review of office practices in Manitoba.控制医生过度诊疗:对曼尼托巴省诊疗实践的回顾
CMAJ. 1992 Mar 1;146(5):723-8.