Maynard A, Bloor K
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, UK.
Health Policy. 1995 Mar;31(3):171-81. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(94)00682-5.
The system of primary care in the UK National Health Service appears to have become popular amongst policy makers worldwide. This is surprising given the poor knowledge base regarding the care provided and its cost effectiveness. It is necessary for policy makers to identify which health care interventions are effective and cost effective, and develop knowledge about how behaviour can be changed and cost effective interventions adopted in routine medical practice. Trials of pharmaceuticals in primary care therapeutic areas reveal a poor knowledge base about clinical effectiveness and often fail to include economic aspects. Initiatives such as the UK general practice fundholding scheme, the general practitioner contract and the Health of the Nation targets were not based on empirical evidence and have not been subject to adequate evaluation. If health care reforms elsewhere are to include emphasis on primary care, policy goals must be clearly articulated and the knowledge base informing efficient delivery of primary care must be improved.
英国国民医疗服务体系中的初级医疗保健系统似乎在全球政策制定者中颇受欢迎。鉴于对所提供医疗保健的了解有限且缺乏成本效益,这一现象令人惊讶。政策制定者有必要确定哪些医疗保健干预措施是有效且具有成本效益的,并积累关于如何改变行为以及在常规医疗实践中采用具有成本效益的干预措施的知识。初级医疗保健治疗领域的药物试验显示,对临床疗效的了解有限,而且往往未纳入经济方面的考量。诸如英国全科医疗基金持有计划、全科医生合同以及“国民健康目标”等举措并非基于实证证据,也未得到充分评估。如果其他地方的医疗保健改革要强调初级医疗保健,就必须明确阐述政策目标,并且必须改进为高效提供初级医疗保健提供依据的知识基础。