Suppr超能文献

哮喘自我管理项目可以减少对医院哮喘护理的需求。

Asthma self-management programs can reduce the need for hospital-based asthma care.

作者信息

Lawrence G

机构信息

Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 1995 Jan;40(1):39-43.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Mortality from asthma and its complications is increasing as is the expense associated with treating this disease. We hypothesized that an asthma-education program, already in place, had reduced hospitalizations (HOS) and emergency-department (ED) visits for asthmatic patients who participated.

METHODS

We compared asthmatic patients' ED visits and HOS for the 12-month periods immediately before and after treatment in our center.

METHODS

All patients received physician-directed medical management based upon the National Asthma Education Panel recommendations. One group (PART, n = 13) received instruction in self-management using the peak-flow meter (PFM) and an action plan (AP) to adjust medication dosages in response to changing post-bronchodilator peak-flow meter readings. Average cost for this intervention was $820 (2 visits, each with 60-90 minutes of instruction). The other group (FULL, n = 13), in addition to receiving a PFM and AP, completed a multidisciplinary education program stressing trigger identification and avoidance, environmental control, proactive adjustment of anti-inflammatory agents, and stress management. Average cost for this intervention was $1,700 (multidisciplinary evaluations and 12 hours of instruction). Those who did not enter the education program did so by choice or circumstance (ie, transportation problems, inability to commit the required time for the program, insurance denial).

RESULTS

Of the 13 PART-group subjects, 8 experienced all 31 ED and/or HOS in the year prior to our program. Four of 13 accounted for the 15 ED and/or HOS after discharge from the program (50% improvement, p < 0.05). Of the 14 patients in the FULL group, 7 accounted for 25 ED and/or HOS prior to the program. There were no ED and/or HOS after the program (100% improvement, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on this sample, it is evident that both PART and FULL programs can significantly impact the frequency with which hospital-based asthma care is required and thus reduce the overall cost of caring for patients with asthma.

摘要

未标注

哮喘及其并发症导致的死亡率正在上升,治疗该疾病的费用也在增加。我们推测,已实施的哮喘教育项目减少了参与项目的哮喘患者的住院次数和急诊就诊次数。

方法

我们比较了本中心哮喘患者在治疗前和治疗后12个月期间的急诊就诊次数和住院次数。

方法

所有患者均接受基于国家哮喘教育小组建议的医生指导的医疗管理。一组(PART组,n = 13)接受了使用峰流速仪(PFM)和行动计划(AP)进行自我管理的指导,以便根据支气管扩张剂使用后峰流速仪读数的变化调整药物剂量。该干预措施的平均费用为820美元(2次就诊,每次有60 - 90分钟的指导)。另一组(FULL组,n = 13)除了接受PFM和AP外,还完成了一个多学科教育项目,该项目强调触发因素的识别与避免、环境控制、抗炎药物的主动调整以及压力管理。该干预措施的平均费用为1700美元(多学科评估和12小时的指导)。那些未参加教育项目的患者是出于选择或情况所致(例如,交通问题、无法抽出项目所需时间、保险拒绝)。

结果

在13名PART组受试者中,8人在我们的项目实施前一年经历了所有31次急诊和/或住院。13人中有4人在项目出院后经历了15次急诊和/或住院(改善了50%,p < 0.05)。在FULL组的14名患者中,7人在项目实施前经历了25次急诊和/或住院。项目实施后没有急诊和/或住院情况(改善了100%,p < 0.05)。

结论

基于这个样本,很明显PART项目和FULL项目都能显著影响哮喘患者所需的住院治疗频率,从而降低哮喘患者护理的总体成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验