Espinoza-Palma Tatiana, Zamorano Alejandra, Arancibia Francisca, Bustos María-Francisca, Silva Maria José, Cardenas Consuelo, De La Barra Pedro, Puente Victoria, Cerda Jaime, Castro-Rodriguez José A, Prado Francisco
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Cristobal Colón 3770 depto 75, Las condes, Santiago, Chile.
J Asthma. 2009 Nov;46(9):906-10. doi: 10.3109/02770900903199979.
Background. Formal education in primary care can reduce asthma exacerbations. However, there are few studies in hospitalized children, with none originating in Latin America. Methods. A prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate whether a full education with self-management plan (ESM) was more effective than an education without self-management plan (E) in reducing asthma hospitalization. Children (5 to 15 years of age) who were hospitalized for an asthma attack were divided in two groups. Children in the E group received general instructions based on a booklet. Those in the ESM group received the same booklet plus a self-management guide and a puzzle game that reinforces the lessons learned in the booklet. Patients were interviewed every 3 months, by telephone, for one year. Interviewers recording the number of hospitalizations, exacerbations, and emergency visits for asthma and oral steroid burst uses. Results. From 88 children who met the inclusion criteria, 77 (86%) completed one year of follow-up (41 from E and 36 from ESM group). Overall, after one year, the hospitalization decreased by 66% and the inhaled corticosteroids therapy increased from 36% to 79%. At the end of the study, there was no difference in exacerbations, emergency visits, oral steroid burst uses, or hospitalizations between the two groups. Conclusions. Asthma education with or without a self-management plan during asthma hospitalization were effective in reducing exacerbations, emergency visits, oral steroid burst uses, and future rehospitalizations. This evidence supports the importance of providing a complete asthma education plan in any patient who is admitted for asthma exacerbation.
背景。初级保健方面的正规教育可减少哮喘发作。然而,针对住院儿童的研究较少,且尚无源自拉丁美洲的研究。方法。设计了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估包含自我管理计划的全面教育(ESM)在减少哮喘住院方面是否比无自我管理计划的教育(E)更有效。因哮喘发作住院的儿童(5至15岁)被分为两组。E组儿童接受基于一本小册子的一般指导。ESM组儿童除了收到相同的小册子外,还收到一份自我管理指南和一个强化小册子中学到知识的益智游戏。通过电话对患者进行为期一年的随访,每3个月访谈一次。访谈者记录哮喘的住院次数、发作次数、急诊就诊次数以及口服类固醇突击治疗的使用情况。结果。在符合纳入标准的88名儿童中,77名(86%)完成了一年的随访(E组41名,ESM组36名)。总体而言,一年后,住院率下降了66%,吸入性皮质类固醇治疗的使用率从36%增至79%。在研究结束时,两组在发作次数、急诊就诊次数、口服类固醇突击治疗的使用情况或住院次数方面没有差异。结论。哮喘住院期间有或无自我管理计划的哮喘教育在减少发作次数、急诊就诊次数、口服类固醇突击治疗的使用情况以及未来再次住院方面均有效。这一证据支持了为因哮喘发作入院的任何患者提供完整哮喘教育计划的重要性。