Suppr超能文献

产科早期出院与传统住院治疗对比

Obstetric early discharge versus traditional hospital stay.

作者信息

Shorten A

机构信息

University of Wollongong.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(2):19-39.

Abstract

Recent research and media reports have suggested that obstetric early discharge is not cost-effective for postnatal care in the Australian health care system, based on the work of the Centre for Health Economic Research and Evaluation. This is probably an erroneous conclusion because the centre excludes the important cost category of medical costs, and its conclusions depend on survey estimates of 'community costs' which are empirically of poor quality and theoretically of doubtful relevance to health care system decision-making. This study finds that obstetric early discharge is more cost-effective than a traditional hospital stay even when community costs are included; and highly cost-effective when considering health system costs alone. Further cost advantages are simulated by increasing obstetric early discharge program activity and reducing length of stay for both programs. Our results suggest that safe, cost-effective options for low-risk obstetric care deserve further investigation in Australia.

摘要

根据健康经济研究与评估中心的研究,近期的研究和媒体报道表明,在澳大利亚医疗体系中,产科早期出院对于产后护理而言并不具有成本效益。这可能是个错误结论,因为该中心排除了医疗成本这一重要的成本类别,其结论依赖于对“社区成本”的调查估计,而这些估计在实证上质量较差,理论上与医疗体系决策的相关性也存疑。本研究发现,即便将社区成本纳入考量,产科早期出院仍比传统住院更具成本效益;仅考虑卫生系统成本时,其成本效益则非常高。通过增加产科早期出院项目活动以及缩短两个项目的住院时长,进一步模拟出了成本优势。我们的研究结果表明,澳大利亚对于低风险产科护理的安全且具成本效益的方案值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验