• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚私人医疗保险激励政策改革后剖宫产率的增加。

Increase in caesarean deliveries after the Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive policy reforms.

机构信息

Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041436. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0041436
PMID:22844477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3402394/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive (PHII) policy reforms implemented in 1997-2000 increased PHI membership in Australia by 50%. Given the higher rate of obstetric interventions in privately insured patients, the reforms may have led to an increase in surgical deliveries and deliveries with longer hospital stays. We aimed to investigate the effect of the PHII policy introduction on birth characteristics in Western Australia (WA).

METHODS AND FINDINGS

All 230,276 birth admissions from January 1995 to March 2004 were identified from administrative birth and hospital data-systems held by the WA Department of Health. Average quarterly birth rates after the PHII introduction were estimated and compared with expected rates had the reforms not occurred. Rate and percentage differences (including 95% confidence intervals) were estimated separately for public and private patients, by mode of delivery, and by length of stay in hospital following birth. The PHII policy introduction was associated with a 20% (-21.4 to -19.3) decrease in public birth rates, a 51% (45.1 to 56.4) increase in private birth rates, a 5% (-5.3 to -5.1) and 8% (-8.9 to -7.9) decrease in unassisted and assisted vaginal deliveries respectively, a 5% (-5.3 to -5.1) increase in caesarean sections with labour and 10% (8.0 to 11.7) increase in caesarean sections without labour. Similarly, birth rates where the infant stayed 0-3 days in hospital following birth decreased by 20% (-21.5 to -18.5), but rates of births with >3 days in hospital increased by 15% (12.2 to 17.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Following the PHII policy implementation in Australia, births in privately insured patients, caesarean deliveries and births with longer infant hospital stays increased. The reforms may not have been beneficial for quality obstetric care in Australia or the burden of Australian hospitals.

摘要

背景

1997 年至 2000 年实施的澳大利亚私人医疗保险激励(PHII)政策改革使澳大利亚的 PHI 会员增加了 50%。鉴于私人保险患者的产科干预率较高,改革可能导致剖宫产分娩和住院时间延长的分娩增加。我们旨在调查 PHII 政策引入对西澳大利亚州(WA)出生特征的影响。

方法和发现

从 WA 卫生部持有的行政分娩和医院数据系统中确定了 1995 年 1 月至 2004 年 3 月期间的所有 230,276 例分娩入院病例。估计 PHII 引入后的平均季度出生率,并与没有发生改革的情况下的预期出生率进行比较。按分娩方式、分娩后住院时间长短,分别为公共和私人患者、剖宫产分娩和阴道分娩,估算率和百分比差异(包括 95%置信区间)。PHII 政策引入与公共分娩率降低 20%(-21.4 至-19.3)、私人分娩率增加 51%(45.1 至 56.4)、无辅助阴道分娩和辅助阴道分娩分别减少 5%(-5.3 至-5.1)和 8%(-8.9 至-7.9)、有产程的剖宫产分娩增加 5%(-5.3 至-5.1)和无产程的剖宫产分娩增加 10%(8.0 至 11.7)有关。同样,出生后在医院住院 0-3 天的婴儿出生率下降 20%(-21.5 至-18.5),但住院时间超过 3 天的出生人数增加了 15%(12.2 至 17.1)。

结论

澳大利亚实施 PHII 政策后,私人保险患者的分娩、剖宫产分娩和婴儿住院时间延长的分娩增加。这些改革可能对澳大利亚的产科护理质量或澳大利亚医院的负担没有好处。

相似文献

1
Increase in caesarean deliveries after the Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive policy reforms.澳大利亚私人医疗保险激励政策改革后剖宫产率的增加。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041436. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
2
The Australian baby bonus maternity payment and birth characteristics in Western Australia.澳大利亚婴儿奖金与西澳大利亚州生育特征。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048885. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
3
Assisted vaginal deliveries in mothers admitted as public or private patients in Western Australia.在澳大利亚西部,以公立或私立患者身份入院的产妇的辅助阴道分娩。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 16;8(4):e61699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061699. Print 2013.
4
Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.首次和第二次分娩剖宫产的发生率及预测因素:澳大利亚女性的一项前瞻性队列研究
Matern Child Health J. 2017 May;21(5):1175-1184. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2216-5.
5
Effect of private insurance incentive policy reforms on trends in coronary revascularisation procedures in the private and public health sectors in Western Australia: a cohort study.私人保险激励政策改革对西澳大利亚州私营和公共卫生部门冠状动脉血运重建手术趋势的影响:一项队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 22;13:280. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-280.
6
Private versus public? Examining hospital use by a privately insured population in New South Wales, Australia, using data linkage.私人与公共?利用数据链接研究澳大利亚新南威尔士州私人保险人群的医院使用情况。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Feb;45(1):14-21. doi: 10.1071/AH19274.
7
Does medical insurance type (private vs public) influence the physician's decision to perform Caesarean delivery?医疗保险类型(私立与公立)是否会影响医生行剖宫产术的决策?
J Med Ethics. 2012 Aug;38(8):470-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100209. Epub 2012 May 5.
8
Financing Maternity and Early Childhood Healthcare in The Australian Healthcare System: Costs to Funders in Private and Public Hospitals Over the First 1000 Days.澳大利亚医疗体系中的母婴保健和早期儿童保健筹资:私营和公立医院头 1000 天的供资者成本。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):554-563. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.68.
9
Publicly insured caesarean sections in private hospitals: a repeated cross-sectional analysis in Chile.公立医院在私立医院行剖宫产术:智利的一项重复横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;9(4):e024241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024241.
10
Going public: do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia?公开上市:风险和选择是否解释了澳大利亚公共和私人分娩地点之间剖腹产率的差异?
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors contributing to socio-economic inequality in utilization of caesarean section delivery among women in Indonesia: Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey.导致印度尼西亚妇女剖宫产利用不平等的社会经济因素:来自人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0291485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291485. eCollection 2023.
2
Prelabour caesarean section and neurodevelopmental outcome at 4 and 12 months of age: an observational study.产前期剖宫产术与 4 及 12 个月龄时的神经发育结局:一项观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03253-8.
3
Caesarean delivery rates and analgesia effectiveness following injections of sterile water for back pain in labour: A multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial.分娩时注射无菌水治疗背痛后的剖宫产率及镇痛效果:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 3;25:100447. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100447. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
A review of the impact of financing mechanisms on maternal health care in Australia.澳大利亚融资机制对妇幼保健影响的综述。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):1540. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7850-6.
5
A qualitative study to explore the attitudes of women and obstetricians towards caesarean delivery in rural Bangladesh.一项探索孟加拉国农村地区妇女和产科医生对剖宫产态度的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1993-9.
6
The relation between cesarean birth and child cognitive development.剖宫产与儿童认知发展的关系。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 13;7(1):11483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10831-y.
7
Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术和私人保险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016600.
8
Substantial out-of-pocket expenditure on maternity care practitioner consultations and treatments during pregnancy: estimates from a nationally-representative sample of pregnant women in Australia.澳大利亚全国代表性孕妇样本的估计:孕期产妇护理从业者咨询和治疗的大量自付费用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 12;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1297-5.
9
Obstetricians' Opinions of the Optimal Caesarean Rate: A Global Survey.产科医生对最佳剖宫产率的看法:一项全球调查。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152779. eCollection 2016.
10
Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the Health Belief Model.影响女性分娩方式决策的因素:健康信念模式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 20;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0931-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospitalisation for bronchiolitis in infants is more common after elective caesarean delivery.婴儿毛细支气管炎的住院治疗在选择性剖宫产术后更为常见。
Arch Dis Child. 2012 May;97(5):410-4. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300607. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
2
Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.澳大利亚新南威尔士州剖宫产分娩的流行病学和趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Jan 20;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-8.
3
Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.畏惧诉讼对产科护理的影响:一项针对产科实践的全国性分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Apr;28(4):277-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1271213. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
4
Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health.无医学指征的剖宫产与不良短期产妇结局风险增加相关:2004-2008 年世卫组织全球孕产妇和围产儿健康调查。
BMC Med. 2010 Nov 10;8:71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71.
5
'What is could indeed be better'--Swedish women's perceptions of early postnatal care.“确实可以更好”——瑞典女性对产后早期护理的看法。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):737-44. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
6
Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.分娩方式对母婴结局的影响:低危产科人群中择期剖宫产与计划性阴道分娩的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jun;283(6):1193-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1525-y. Epub 2010 May 27.
7
Mode of delivery and obstetric outcomes in Asia.
Womens Health (Lond). 2010 May;6(3):365-6. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.14.
8
Neonatal outcomes associated with planned vaginal versus planned primary cesarean delivery.计划性阴道分娩与计划性剖宫产分娩新生儿结局的比较。
J Perinatol. 2010 Apr;30(4):258-64. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.150. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
9
Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.通过产妇要求估算剖宫产率:对澳大利亚产科医生的匿名调查。
Birth. 2009 Sep;36(3):208-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00331.x.
10
Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的护理模式与针对育龄妇女的其他护理模式对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2.