Suppr超能文献

在-18摄氏度至50摄氏度的工作温度范围内对十种手动复苏器进行评估。

Evaluation of ten manual resuscitators across an operational temperature range of -18 degrees C to 50 degrees C.

作者信息

Barnes T A, Stockwell D L

机构信息

Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Respir Care. 1991 Mar;36(3):161-72.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Because of the temperature extremes encountered during emergency resuscitation and transport in the field, we sought to evaluate the performance and safety of 10 adult resuscitators (5 permanent units: Hope 4, Laerdal, Lifesaver, Mark 3, and PMR; and 5 disposable units: BagEasy, Code Blue, CPR Bag, DMR, and SPUR) across an operational temperature range of -18 degrees C to 50 degrees C.

METHOD

We tested the devices against the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard F-920 and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standard 8382. We tested each resuscitator by using a lung model, the Bio-Tek VT-1 Ventilator Tester.

RESULTS

All of the resuscitators met the ventilation requirements for VT and F (600 mL X 20) and I:E less than 1:1 except the SPUR at -18 degrees C. Standards ASTM F-920 and ISO 8382 specify a fractional delivered oxygen concentration (FDO2) of greater than or equal to 0.85 with attachments and greater than or equal to 0.40 without attachments at oxygen flow of 15 L/min and VE of 7.2 L/min (600 mL X 12). Nine resuscitators met Standards ASTM F-920 and ISO 8382 for FDO2 with attachments at 21 degrees C and 50 degrees C, but only 3 units (Code Blue, DMR, and PMR) passed at -18 degrees C. At 21 degrees C, the Hope 4 had an FDO2 of 0.77 +/- 0.03, which was significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than that of the other 9 resuscitators, all of which were greater than or equal to 0.93. Nine resuscitators met the FDO2 standard without attachments. All 10 resuscitators passed the tests for valve function after contamination with simulated vomitus (at an oxygen flow of 30 L/min) and for backward leakage. At the ventilation pattern recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA) (800 mL X 12) the PMR's mean FDO2 dropped to 0.86 +/- 0.03 because of air leaking into the bag where it attaches to the patient-valve assembly. All 10 resuscitators passed the test for mechanical shock at 21 degrees C and 50 degrees C, but 3 units failed at -18 degrees C.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that only the Code Blue and DMR meet the ASTM and ISO standards for operator-powered adult resuscitators across the operational temperature range of -18 degrees C to 50 degrees C.

摘要

未标注

由于在现场紧急复苏和转运过程中会遇到极端温度,我们试图评估10种成人复苏器(5种永久性设备:Hope 4、Laerdal、Lifesaver、Mark 3和PMR;以及5种一次性设备:BagEasy、Code Blue、CPR Bag、DMR和SPUR)在-18摄氏度至50摄氏度的工作温度范围内的性能和安全性。

方法

我们根据美国材料与试验协会(ASTM)标准F - 920和国际标准化组织(ISO)标准8382对这些设备进行测试。我们使用肺模型Bio - Tek VT - 1呼吸机测试仪对每种复苏器进行测试。

结果

除了在-18摄氏度时的SPUR外,所有复苏器均满足潮气量(VT)和呼吸频率(F)(600毫升×20次)以及吸呼比小于1:1的通气要求。ASTM F - 920和ISO 8382标准规定,在氧气流量为15升/分钟、分钟通气量(VE)为7.2升/分钟(600毫升×12次)时,带附件的氧气输送分数(FDO2)应大于或等于0.85,不带附件时应大于或等于0.40。9种复苏器在21摄氏度和50摄氏度时带附件的情况下符合ASTM F - 920和ISO 8382标准的FDO2要求,但在-18摄氏度时只有3种设备(Code Blue、DMR和PMR)通过测试。在21摄氏度时,Hope 4的FDO2为0.77±0.03,显著低于其他9种复苏器(p<0.001),其他9种复苏器均大于或等于0.93。9种复苏器在不带附件的情况下符合FDO2标准。所有10种复苏器在被模拟呕吐物污染后(氧气流量为30升/分钟)的阀门功能测试和逆向泄漏测试中均通过。按照美国心脏协会(AHA)推荐的通气模式(800毫升×12次),由于空气泄漏到与患者阀门组件相连的袋子中,PMR的平均FDO2降至0.86±0.03。所有10种复苏器在21摄氏度和50摄氏度时的机械冲击测试中均通过,但在-18摄氏度时有3种设备未通过。

结论

我们得出结论,在-18摄氏度至50摄氏度的工作温度范围内,只有Code Blue和DMR符合ASTM和ISO标准的成人手动复苏器要求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验