Podrid P J, Arnold R J, Kaniecki D J
Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, University Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Dec;2(6):456-67. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202060-00006.
Recently, the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) has focused attention on the morbidity and mortality that may be associated with pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapies. While the severity and frequency of adverse effects vary among the available agents, it is uncertain whether initial therapy with one agent is preferable to that with another when efficacy, incidence of adverse effects and costs of treating these adverse effects are examined. Moreover, it is uncertain whether pharmacotherapy is more cost-effective than other strategies.
最近,心律失常抑制试验(CAST)已将人们的注意力集中在与药物抗心律失常治疗可能相关的发病率和死亡率上。虽然现有药物的不良反应严重程度和发生频率各不相同,但在比较疗效、不良反应发生率以及治疗这些不良反应的成本时,尚不确定初始使用一种药物治疗是否优于另一种药物治疗。此外,药物治疗是否比其他策略更具成本效益也尚不确定。