Schloman B F, Byrne T J
Libraries, Kent State University, OH 44242.
Health Educ Res. 1992 Mar;7(1):117-28. doi: 10.1093/her/7.1.117.
The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which health education has become a distinctly separate field of inquiry as evidenced by the patterns of information transfer in the health education research literature. Bibliometric analysis is used to determine: (1) if health education has an identifiable core of journals, (2) the extent to which health education research is derivative of research from other disciplines and (3) the extent to which research from other disciplines draws upon research published in health education journals. The results suggest that there is an identifiable core of journals that serve to characterize health education as a distinct field of inquiry. However, health education research is found to be more derivative of research from other fields than are the other comparative fields in the sample. Moreover, researchers in other disciplines use health education research less than half as often as health education uses its own research. Differences in citing patterns in journals dedicated to health education and by researchers publishing on health education topics in research journals of other areas seem to indicate that health education research is not one unified undertaking.
本研究的目的是通过健康教育研究文献中的信息传播模式,考察健康教育在何种程度上已成为一个截然不同的独立研究领域。文献计量分析用于确定:(1)健康教育是否有一批可识别的核心期刊;(2)健康教育研究在多大程度上源自其他学科的研究;(3)其他学科的研究在多大程度上借鉴了发表在健康教育期刊上的研究成果。结果表明,存在一批可识别的核心期刊,这些期刊可将健康教育界定为一个独特的研究领域。然而,研究发现,与样本中的其他可比领域相比,健康教育研究更多地源自其他领域的研究。此外,其他学科的研究人员引用健康教育研究的频率还不到健康教育领域自身研究被引用频率的一半。专注于健康教育的期刊以及在其他领域研究期刊上发表健康教育主题文章的研究人员在引用模式上的差异,似乎表明健康教育研究并非一项统一的事业。