Carroll J S
Behavioral and Policy Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139.
Behav Sci Law. 1991 Spring;9(2):129-42. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370090204.
Research has shown that substantial numbers of mental health patients may be coerced into 'voluntary' treatment. This article examines the concept of coercion to address the concerns of social scientists, treatment providers, and policy makers to know when coercion into treatment has occurred. This logically takes precedence over the second important question of whether or not coercion is desirable in some situations. A review of the scientific research on coercion and related topics of freedom, control, and choice leads to a theoretical framework in which coercion is defined in terms of opportunities to choose among courses of action. Implications of this analysis are drawn for mental health service delivery, mental health policy, and mental health research.
研究表明,大量精神健康患者可能会被胁迫接受“自愿”治疗。本文探讨胁迫的概念,以回应社会科学家、治疗提供者和政策制定者对于了解何时发生了胁迫接受治疗情况的关切。从逻辑上讲,这优先于第二个重要问题,即在某些情况下胁迫是否可取。对关于胁迫以及自由、控制和选择等相关主题的科学研究进行回顾,得出了一个理论框架,在该框架中,胁迫是根据在行动方案中进行选择的机会来定义的。本文还针对精神健康服务提供、精神健康政策和精神健康研究得出了这一分析的启示。