Singh N C, Kissoon N, Frewen T, Tiffin N
Departments of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Clin Intensive Care. 1991;2(6):345-50.
To study the influence of varying outer suction catheter (SC) diameter (OD) to inner endotracheal tube (ETT) diameter (ID) and suction pressures (SP) on heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO 2) and intracranial pressure (ICP) during ETT and oral suctioning. An additional aim was to define an optimal suction catheter size that would prove easy to introduce and be rapidly effective in clearing secretions with the least physiological alteration.
Prospective study.
Paediatric intensive care unit.
Ventilated paediatric patients.
Patients had ETT suctioning performed in a random fashion using suction catheters with SC outer diameter to inner ETT diameter of approximately 0.4, 0.7 and 0.9 using varying pressures (80, 100, 120 mmHg). Using the medium size suction catheter (OD/ID = 0.7) at 100 mmHg of suction pressure, oral suctioning was compared to ETT suctioning.
Seventeen patients were studied (age 6.5 + 5 months). All suction catheters at varying pressures resulted in similar transient alterations in HR, RR, MAP, SaO 2 and ICP following ETT suctioning. Significant changes were seen in SaO 2, HR and ICP, irrespective of the catheter diameter or suction pressure. Oral suctioning resulted in similar trends and magnitude of changes as for ETT suctioning in MAP, RR, HR, and ICP, but less change occurred in the SaO 2 (p less than 0.05). The catheters with OD/ID of 0.7 were easiest to introduce and most effective in clearing secretions.
Our study suggests that: 1. Tracheal toilet using variations in OD/ID ratios and SP within limits tested resulted in similar significant adverse changes in HR, ICP and SaO 2 and similar trends in RR and MAP. 2. Based on the ease of introduction and the effectiveness of clearing secretions, a medium SC (OD/ID = 0.7) is most appropriate for infants and children. 3. Oral suctioning also results in adverse physiological changes, therefore similar precautions to those taken during tracheal suctioning should be followed for oral suctioning.
研究不同外径的外吸痰管(SC)与气管内导管(ETT)内径(ID)的比例以及吸痰压力(SP)对气管内吸痰和口咽部吸痰期间心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)和颅内压(ICP)的影响。另一个目的是确定一种最佳的吸痰管尺寸,该尺寸应易于插入,并能在对生理影响最小的情况下迅速有效地清除分泌物。
前瞻性研究。
儿科重症监护病房。
接受机械通气的儿科患者。
使用外径与气管内导管内径比例约为0.4、0.7和0.9的吸痰管,以不同压力(80、100、120 mmHg)对患者进行随机气管内吸痰。使用外径/内径为0.7的中型吸痰管,在100 mmHg的吸痰压力下,对口咽部吸痰和气管内吸痰进行比较。
对17例患者(年龄6.5±5个月)进行了研究。在气管内吸痰后,所有不同压力下的吸痰管均导致心率、呼吸频率、平均动脉压、动脉血氧饱和度和颅内压出现类似的短暂变化。无论吸痰管直径或吸痰压力如何,动脉血氧饱和度、心率和颅内压均出现显著变化。口咽部吸痰在平均动脉压、呼吸频率、心率和颅内压方面导致的变化趋势和幅度与气管内吸痰相似,但动脉血氧饱和度的变化较小(p<0.05)。外径/内径为0.7的吸痰管最易于插入,且清除分泌物最有效。
我们的研究表明:1. 在测试的范围内,使用不同外径/内径比例和吸痰压力进行气道清理,会导致心率、颅内压和动脉血氧饱和度出现类似的显著不良变化,呼吸频率和平均动脉压出现类似趋势。2. 基于易于插入和清除分泌物的有效性,中型吸痰管(外径/内径 = 0.7)最适合婴儿和儿童。3. 口咽部吸痰也会导致不良的生理变化,因此口咽部吸痰应采取与气管内吸痰类似的预防措施。