• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Running mass closure of abdominal wounds using absorbable looped suture.

作者信息

Montz F J, Creasman W T, Eddy G, Disaia P J

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

J Gynecol Surg. 1991 Summer;7(2):107-10. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1991.7.107.

DOI:10.1089/gyn.1991.7.107
PMID:10149779
Abstract

Three hundred patients undergoing celiotomies had fascial incisions closed using O-Maxon looped suture employing a knot-free running modification of the Smead Jones method. Two hundred ninety-three patients were evaluated prospectively to determine efficacy and safety of this technique. Seventy-two percent of patients underwent celiotomies for treatment of malignant diseases. A vertical incision was used in 79% and a transverse incision in 21% of patients. Mean fascial closure time was 8.4 minutes (range 3-32), without a significant difference between the vertical and transverse incisions. Overall suture handling was judged as excellent in 44% of the patients and good in 54%. Six weeks postoperatively, wounds were healed in 99% of patients, with less than 1% having residual infection or unclosed, granulating wounds. No herniation or fascial dehiscences occurred in this series. We conclude that Maxon looped suture employing a knot-free running Smead Jones technique appears to be a safe, efficient, and effective closure method in this group of patients. Further follow-up will be required to show whether this outcome is sustained.

摘要

相似文献

1
Running mass closure of abdominal wounds using absorbable looped suture.
J Gynecol Surg. 1991 Summer;7(2):107-10. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1991.7.107.
2
Abdominal wound closure using a running, looped monofilament polybutester suture: comparison to Smead-Jones closure in historic controls.使用连续环行单丝聚丁酯缝线进行腹部伤口缝合:与历史对照中的斯米德-琼斯缝合法比较
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;80(4):650-4.
3
Primary mass closure of fascial incisions using a continuous absorbable suture.
J Gynecol Surg. 1991 Spring;7(1):41-5. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1991.7.41.
4
[Continuous suture in laparotomy using an absorbable eyelet thread according to the Smead Jones technique].[根据斯米德·琼斯技术,使用可吸收小孔缝线在剖腹术中进行连续缝合]
Minerva Chir. 1994 Jul-Aug;49(7-8):693-6.
5
Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence.
Arch Surg. 1977 Oct;112(10):1188-91. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370100042008.
6
Dexon: an excellent suture for midline incisions.德克松:一种用于正中切口的优质缝线。
Can J Surg. 1976 Jan;19(1):54-8.
7
Results of the Smead-Jones technique of closure of vertical midline incisions for emergency laparotomies--a prospective study of 403 patients.
Trop Gastroenterol. 1995 Oct-Dec;16(4):62-7.
8
Polyglyconate (Maxon) versus nylon suture in midline abdominal incision closure: a prospective randomized trial.聚乙醇酸缝线(美生)与尼龙缝线用于腹部正中切口缝合的前瞻性随机试验。
Am Surg. 1995 Nov;61(11):980-3.
9
Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Apr-Jun;23(2):51-4.
10
Dexon plus versus Maxon fascial closure in morbid obesity: a prospective randomized comparison.
Can J Surg. 1990 Aug;33(4):302-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture.使用合成单丝可吸收环形缝线对清洁和污染的腹部伤口进行连续缝合。
Surg Today. 1999;29(9):874-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02482778.