• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大的仿制药竞争。

Generic competition in Canada.

作者信息

Steele J W

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Nov;6(5):480-2. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406050-00010.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-199406050-00010
PMID:10155276
Abstract

This study was designed to assess the potential impact of generic drug competition on prescription prices in Ontario, Canada, and the costs and benefits of the passage of Bill C-22 by the Canadian federal government. Bill C-22, passed in 1987, extended the period during which a patented drug is exempt from compulsory licensing by a generic drug manufacturer, and created the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB). The purpose of the PMPRB is to 'ensure that the prices of patented medicines charged by patentees are not excessive' and to 'report annually on the ratios of research-and-development expenditures to sales for individual patentees and for the patented pharmaceutical industry as a whole'. Lexchin analysed prices in the 1991 Drug Benefit Formulary of Ontario for interchangeable products which were manufactured by more than one company. He also noted the best available price for the highest and lowest priced versions, and the number of manufacturers of that product. Products were then grouped according to the number of manufacturers, and the price of the least expensive version of each product was expressed as a percentage of that of the most expensive version (i.e. the proportional cost). For products marketed by 2 to 6 companies, the data were further subdivided into 4 categories representing 0%, non-maximal, maximal and 100% generic competition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究旨在评估非专利药竞争对加拿大安大略省处方药价格的潜在影响,以及加拿大联邦政府通过的C-22法案的成本和收益。1987年通过的C-22法案延长了专利药免受非专利药制造商强制许可的期限,并设立了专利药品价格审查委员会(PMPRB)。PMPRB的目的是“确保专利权人收取的专利药品价格不过高”,并“每年报告个别专利权人和整个专利制药行业的研发支出与销售额之比”。莱克钦分析了安大略省1991年药品福利处方集里由多家公司生产的可互换产品的价格。他还记录了最高和最低价格版本的最佳可得价格以及该产品的制造商数量。然后根据制造商数量对产品进行分组,每种产品最便宜版本的价格表示为最昂贵版本价格的百分比(即比例成本)。对于由2至6家公司销售的产品,数据进一步细分为4类,分别代表0%、非最大、最大和100%的非专利药竞争。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Generic competition in Canada.加拿大的仿制药竞争。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Nov;6(5):480-2. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406050-00010.
2
The effect of generic competition on the price of brand-name drugs.仿制药竞争对品牌药价格的影响。
Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.07.007.
3
Effect of generic drug competition on the price of prescription drugs in Ontario.仿制药竞争对安大略省处方药价格的影响。
CMAJ. 1993 Jan 1;148(1):35-8.
4
The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform.美国处方药价格居高不下:根源与改革前景。
JAMA. 2016;316(8):858-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11237.
5
High prices for generics in Australia - more competition might help.澳大利亚仿制药价格高昂——增加竞争或许会有所帮助。
Aust Health Rev. 2009 May;33(2):200-14. doi: 10.1071/ah090200.
6
After years of steady growth, winds of restraint blowing on prescription-drug industry.在经历多年稳步增长后,处方药行业正面临限制之风。
CMAJ. 1995 Jul 1;153(1):85-8.
7
Relationships between the academic community and the pharmaceutical industry: the legislative background and its effect on spending on medical research and development.学术界与制药行业之间的关系:立法背景及其对医学研发支出的影响。
Clin Invest Med. 1996 Dec;19(6):470-8.
8
The Impact of Price-cap Regulations on Exit by Generic Pharmaceutical Firms.价格上限监管对仿制药公司退出市场的影响。
Med Care. 2016 Sep;54(9):884-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000577.
9
Money left on the table: generic drug prices in Canada.被浪费的钱:加拿大的仿制药价格
Healthc Policy. 2013 Feb;8(3):17-25.
10
Points to consider about prescription drug prices: an overview of federal policy and pricing studies.关于处方药价格需考虑的要点:联邦政策与定价研究概述
Clin Ther. 1993 Jul-Aug;15(4):726-38.

引用本文的文献

1
Did the Introduction of Biosimilars Influence Their Prices and Utilization? The Case of Biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (bDMARD) in Bulgaria.生物类似药的引入是否影响了其价格和使用情况?以保加利亚的生物抗风湿药物(bDMARD)为例。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;14(1):64. doi: 10.3390/ph14010064.