Burkle F M, McGrady K A, Newett S L, Nelson J J, Dworken J T, Lyerly W H, Natsios A S, Lillibridge S R
University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu 96826, USA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995 Jan-Mar;10(1):48-56. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00041662.
Complex humanitarian emergencies lack a mechanism to coordinate, communicate, assess, and evaluate response and outcome for the major participants (United Nations, International Committee of the Red Cross, non-governmental organizations and military forces). Success in these emergencies will depend on the ability to accomplish agreed upon measures of effectiveness (MOEs). A recent civil-military humanitarian exercise demonstrated the ability of participants to develop consensus-driven MOEs. These MOEs combined security measures utilized by the military with humanitarian indicators recognized by relief organizations. Measures of effectiveness have the potential to be a unifying disaster management tool and a partial solution to the communication and coordination problems inherent in these complex emergencies.
复杂的人道主义紧急情况缺乏一种机制,无法让主要参与者(联合国、红十字国际委员会、非政府组织和军事力量)对响应行动和结果进行协调、沟通、评估和评价。这些紧急情况的成功将取决于能否达成商定的效能衡量标准(MOE)。最近一次军民人道主义演习展示了参与者制定以共识为驱动的效能衡量标准的能力。这些效能衡量标准将军方采用的安全措施与救援组织认可的人道主义指标结合起来。效能衡量标准有可能成为一种统一的灾害管理工具,并部分解决这些复杂紧急情况中固有的沟通和协调问题。