Nutt P C
College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1996 Summer;41(2):176-96.
This study examined how top managers view the prospects of success and resistance when using four implementation approaches in participative and control cultures that foster climates more or less conducive to change. An accommodation approach was viewed as having the best prospect of success and of lowering resistance in a participative culture. Bargaining and incentive approaches were thought to have successful and low resistance outcomes, which were just below those of accommodation, in a control type of culture. A persuasion approach was thought to be the least effective implementation approach in a control-oriented culture. These preferences differ from prescriptions found in the implementation literature. Assuming that preferences influence behavior, implementation success could be improved if managers selected an implementation approach according to the demands of the situation. More research is needed to appreciate fully the rationale that lies behind the preferences uncovered in this research.
本研究考察了高层管理者如何看待在参与型和控制型文化中使用四种实施方法时的成功前景和阻力,这些文化营造出或多或少有利于变革的氛围。在参与型文化中,迁就方法被视为具有最佳的成功前景和降低阻力的效果。在控制型文化中,谈判和激励方法被认为会带来成功且阻力较小的结果,但其效果略逊于迁就方法。在以控制为导向的文化中,说服方法被认为是最无效的实施方法。这些偏好与实施文献中的规定不同。假设偏好会影响行为,那么如果管理者根据具体情况的要求选择实施方法,实施成功率可能会提高。需要进行更多研究,以充分理解本研究中发现的偏好背后的基本原理。