Suppr超能文献

对话。隐私保护:纸质记录还是电子记录?医疗记录的保密性。

Dialogue. Privacy protection: paper or computer records? Confidentiality of healthcare records.

作者信息

Barrows R C, Clayton P D

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, USA.

出版信息

Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1996 Feb;5(1):38, 41, 43-4.

Abstract

In summary, security concerns surrounding health data are justified, but solutions are surmountable with currently available technologies. Whether systems are paper or electronic, human factors such as errors, negligence and unethical activities can result in breaches of confidentiality, despite optimal implementations. Neither automated teller machines (ATMs) nor EMRs are free from instances of abuse, but policies and protocols for electronic systems can be implemented that may provide better security than analogous paper record systems.

摘要

总之,围绕健康数据的安全担忧是合理的,但利用现有技术可以克服这些问题。无论系统是纸质的还是电子的,尽管实施得很完善,但诸如错误、疏忽和不道德行为等人为因素都可能导致保密性被破坏。自动取款机(ATM)和电子病历系统都存在被滥用的情况,但可以实施电子系统的政策和协议,其安全性可能比类似的纸质记录系统更好。

相似文献

5
Property rights and privacy principles.产权与隐私原则。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2000 Winter;14(4):83-93.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验