Williams R
Division of Public Health, Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds, England.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;8 Suppl 1:80-4. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199500081-00017.
There is a global perspective to the economic consequences of diabetes, which is illustrated in the many publications now being produced on this subject. Because of the higher prevalence of type II diabetes, its impact is greater than that of type I diabetes in both developed and developing countries (but particularly in the latter). It has frequently been argued that advances in the therapy of diabetes and, in particular, advances in the prevention of diabetic complications, will reduce the costs of care. This may well be the case. However, the effects of these preventive measures on the quality of life of individuals living with diabetes and on the indirect costs of diabetes are likely to be much more marked than their effects on direct costs. The economic arguments for applying these findings are compelling in the long term but, in the short term, their application entails considerable investment. While the capacity of any country to make these investments is limited, the capacity of developing countries to make these even short term investments is severely limited and will be further taxed as noncommunicable diseases such as diabetes become more and more prevalent while the problems of treating and preventing communicable diseases remain a challenge.
糖尿病的经济后果具有全球视角,这在目前关于该主题的众多出版物中得到了体现。由于II型糖尿病的患病率较高,在发达国家和发展中国家(尤其是后者),其影响都大于I型糖尿病。人们经常认为,糖尿病治疗的进展,尤其是糖尿病并发症预防的进展,将降低护理成本。情况很可能如此。然而,这些预防措施对糖尿病患者生活质量和糖尿病间接成本的影响,可能比对直接成本的影响更为显著。从长远来看,应用这些研究结果的经济论据很有说服力,但在短期内,其应用需要大量投资。虽然任何国家进行这些投资的能力都是有限的,但发展中国家进行这些短期投资的能力严重受限,而且随着糖尿病等非传染性疾病越来越普遍,而治疗和预防传染性疾病的问题仍然是一项挑战,发展中国家将承受更大压力。