Suppr超能文献

加入按人头付费的独立执业协会:你应该加入,还是不应该加入?

Joining a capitated IPA: should you, or shouldn't you?

作者信息

Marcus L J, Dorn B C

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health, USA.

出版信息

Med Econ. 1996 Nov 11;73(21):228-32.

Abstract

The "bygone" doctor practiced in the good old days under a relatively uncomplicated, clearly defined system. Physicians could afford to be independent. To survive in practice today, say the authors of "Renegotiating Health Care: Resolving Conflict to Build Collaboration," physicians must adapt to change or the health-care market will pass them by. Today's "evolving" doctor is a partner, contributing to and deriving benefit through collaborative patient-care networks, physician practice organizations, and medical services organizations. Historical rivalries have been forgotten as hospitals, insurers, and physicians seek and achieve innovative alliances. Still, resistance to these plans runs strong. The following story typifies one dilemma that faces physicians today. It concerns a hypothetical group practice that must decide whether to form a capitated individual practice association.

摘要

“过去的”医生在过去相对简单、明确的体系下行医。医生们能够保持独立。《重新协商医疗保健:解决冲突以建立合作》的作者们表示,如今要想在医疗行业生存下去,医生们必须适应变革,否则医疗保健市场将把他们抛在身后。如今“不断演变的”医生是合作伙伴,通过协作式患者护理网络、医生执业组织和医疗服务组织做出贡献并从中受益。随着医院、保险公司和医生寻求并达成创新联盟,以往的竞争已被抛诸脑后。然而,对这些计划的抵制依然强烈。下面这个故事典型地反映了如今医生们面临的一个困境。它涉及一个假设的联合诊所,该诊所必须决定是否组建一个按人头付费的个体执业协会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验