Jönsson B
Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10 Suppl 2:68-74. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00011.
Public drug expenditure has increased in Sweden over the past 5 years, primarily because of increased spending on new and more expensive drugs. This increase has placed greater pressure on the existing pharmaceutical reimbursement system, and in turn there has been a tendency for government to increase the level of regulation of this system in order to improve its efficiency and to control costs. Plans to reform the reimbursement system are being formulated both in terms of financing and patient co-payment (cost sharing) for prescription drugs. If these plans are implemented, the cost of prescription pharmaceuticals will be transferred from the Swedish National Social Insurance Board to the country councils, thus ending the open-ended public insurance scheme for prescription drugs and integrating this expenditure within the global healthcare budget for each council. A number of issues will need to be resolved if this transfer takes place, however, not the least of which will be the regulation of cost sharing. In this article, the consequences of cost sharing and the impact of 5 different models for patient co-payment for prescription drugs are analysed and compared with the present reimbursement system in Sweden.
在过去5年里,瑞典的公共药品支出有所增加,主要原因是在新的、更昂贵的药品上的支出增加。这种增长给现有的药品报销系统带来了更大压力,相应地,政府倾向于加强对该系统的监管,以提高其效率并控制成本。目前正在制定关于药品报销系统改革的计划,涉及融资和患者自付费用(成本分担)方面。如果这些计划得以实施,处方药成本将从瑞典国家社会保险局转移到各郡议会,从而结束无上限的处方药公共保险计划,并将这笔支出纳入每个议会的全球医疗预算。然而,如果发生这种转移,有许多问题需要解决,其中最重要的就是成本分担的监管问题。在本文中,分析了成本分担的后果以及5种不同的处方药患者自付模式的影响,并与瑞典现行的报销系统进行了比较。