• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康促进成功的证据:改进建议。

Evidence for success in health promotion: suggestions for improvement.

作者信息

Macdonald G, Veen C, Tones K

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University College of Ripon, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 1996 Sep;11(3):367-76. doi: 10.1093/her/11.3.367.

DOI:10.1093/her/11.3.367
PMID:10163567
Abstract

This paper argues that health promotion needs to develop an approach to evaluation and effectiveness that values qualitative methodologies. It posits the idea that qualitative research could learn from the experience of quantitative researchers and promote more useful ways of measuring effectiveness by the use of intermediate and indirect indicators. It refers to a European-wide project designed to gather information on the effectiveness of health promotion interventions. This project discovered that there was a need for an instrument that allowed qualitative intervention methodologies to be assessed in the same way as quantitative methods.

摘要

本文认为,健康促进需要开发一种重视定性方法的评估和有效性方法。它提出这样一种观点,即定性研究可以借鉴定量研究人员的经验,并通过使用中间指标和间接指标来推广更有效的衡量有效性的方法。它提到了一个旨在收集健康促进干预措施有效性信息的全欧洲项目。该项目发现,需要有一种工具,能够以与定量方法相同的方式评估定性干预方法。

相似文献

1
Evidence for success in health promotion: suggestions for improvement.健康促进成功的证据:改进建议。
Health Educ Res. 1996 Sep;11(3):367-76. doi: 10.1093/her/11.3.367.
2
[Evaluating quality and effectiveness in the promotion of health: approaches and methods of public health and social sciences].[评估促进健康中的质量与效果:公共卫生与社会科学的方法与途径]
Promot Educ. 1997 Jun;4(2):10-5. doi: 10.1177/102538239700400205.
3
Evaluation of community-based oral health promotion and oral disease prevention--WHO recommendations for improved evidence in public health practice.基于社区的口腔健康促进与口腔疾病预防评估——世界卫生组织关于在公共卫生实践中提高证据质量的建议
Community Dent Health. 2004 Dec;21(4 Suppl):319-29.
4
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
5
Analyzing the outcomes of health promotion practices.分析健康促进实践的结果。
Promot Educ. 2007;Suppl 1:21-6. doi: 10.1177/10253823070140010501x.
6
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
9
Assessing the quality of mental health promotion and prevention in Croatia: the case of Istria.评估克罗地亚心理健康促进与预防的质量:伊斯特拉半岛的案例
Health Promot Int. 2017 Jun 1;32(3):511-521. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav111.
10
An extensive literature review of the evaluation of HIV prevention programmes.对艾滋病预防项目评估的广泛文献综述。
Health Educ Res. 1996 Sep;11(3):327-38. doi: 10.1093/her/11.3.327.

引用本文的文献

1
Linking science and policy to support the implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury.将科学与政策联系起来,以支持《水俣公约》的实施。
Ambio. 2018 Mar;47(2):198-215. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-1003-x.
2
Recommendations and Improvements for the Evaluation of Integrated Community-Wide Interventions Approaches.社区范围综合干预方法评估的建议与改进
J Obes. 2016;2016:2385698. doi: 10.1155/2016/2385698. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
3
Framework for Selecting Best Practices in Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review.公共卫生领域最佳实践选择框架:一项系统文献综述
J Public Health Res. 2015 Nov 17;4(3):577. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.577.
4
An exploratory cluster randomised trial of a university halls of residence based social norms marketing campaign to reduce alcohol consumption among 1st year students.一项基于大学宿舍的社会规范营销活动的探索性集群随机试验,旨在减少一年级学生的酒精消费。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013 Apr 18;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-15.
5
The 'Walking for Wellbeing in the West' randomised controlled trial of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with physical activity consultation with 12 month follow-up: rationale and study design.“西方健康步行”随机对照试验:一项基于计步器的步行计划与体育活动咨询相结合并进行12个月随访的研究:原理与研究设计
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 26;8:259. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-259.
6
[Health education in schools for adults: by a teacher or health education lecture?].[针对成年人的学校健康教育:由教师授课还是举办健康教育讲座?]
Aten Primaria. 2000 Mar 15;25(4):242-7. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78494-0.