Pereira Lima Vera Lucia Góes, Arruda José Maria, Barroso Maria Auxiliadora Bessa, Lobato Tavares Maria de Fátima, Ribeiro Campos Nora Zamith, Zandonadil Regina Celi Moreira Basílio, da Rocha Rosa Maria, Parreira Clélia Maria de Souza Ferreira, Cohen Simone Cynamon, Kligerman Débora Cynamon, Sperandio Ana Maria Girotti, Correa Carlos Roberto Silveira, Serrano Miguel Malo
Latin America Regional Office of the International Union of Health Promotion and Education-IUHPE/LARO, Brazil.
Promot Educ. 2007;Suppl 1:21-6. doi: 10.1177/10253823070140010501x.
This article focuses on health promotion (HP) outcomes, illustrated through evaluation of case studies and identification of strategies which have contributed to their success and sustainability. Evaluation research and practice in three distinct sceneries are discussed: (i) institutional and governmental agencies; (ii) communities in the "Manguinhos Complex" and Nova Iguaqu Municipality, and (iii) building of potentially healthy municipality networks. The effectiveness of a social program in a health promotion perspective was based in the "School for Parents" program, undertaken by the First Court of Childhood and Youth of Rio de Janeiro, between 2001 and 2004. The analysis was grounded in the monitoring of 48 parents in charge of children under 18, who were victims of abuse, violence or negligence, and social exclusion, most of all. The study's objectives were: illustrating the evidence of effectiveness of health promotion, discussing the concept of HP effectiveness under macro unfavorable conditions, and identifying strategies that foster sustainability of results. Institutional resources included a multi-professional staff, multidisciplinary approaches, participatory workshops, family case management, partnership with public and private institutions, and volunteer and civil society sponsorship of the families. Evaluation was based on social impact indicators, and psychosocial and contextual determinants. Evaluation methods included program monitoring and quantitative-qualitative methods, through a longitudinal evaluation of 3 years, including one year post program. The evaluation showed highly favorable results concerning "family integration', "quality of family relations" and "human rights mobilization". Unsatisfactory results such as "lack of access to formal employment" are likely related to structural factors and the need for new public policies in areas such as education, professional training, housing, and access to formal employment. The training process of social actors in environmental management and housing, supported by the Public Health Technology Development Project of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, was employed as a tool of environmental education and healthy housing. The purpose of this study was to construct an integrated and participatory model of environment management. The methodology included training, research and evaluation of participants, from 21 to 50 years of age, who participated in building Thematic Learning Books and Community Guides about water quality monitoring. Participants'evaluations emphasized the training process, encouraging them to become multiplier agents of environmental education in their communities and to continue learning how to bring together sectors for problems solving. The Potentially Healthy Districts' Network (RMPS) aimed at increasing knowledge and building capacity to develop actions which originate from each of the local units, based on their characteristics and practices. Developed by the Preventive and Social Department of Campinas State University with PAHO/WHO and the Society Special Research Institute (IPES), RMPS's mission was to cooperate in the construction of healthy public policies in a participatory and articulated way through different municipal representatives. The network offered tools to municipal administrations to develop integrated projects that brought together government, managers, technicians, academy and organizations for the construction of public policies aimed at health promotion and quality of life. The methodology is based in the construction of knowledge and action networks by social actors, stimulating trans-sectorial and inter-district actions. The outcome evaluation is based on case studies, focus groups, oral stories, documents and image analyses.
本文聚焦于健康促进(HP)成果,通过对案例研究的评估以及对促成其成功与可持续性的策略的识别加以阐述。文中讨论了三种不同场景下的评估研究与实践:(i)机构和政府机构;(ii)“曼吉纽斯综合区”和新伊瓜苏市的社区;(iii)构建潜在健康城市网络。从健康促进角度看,一项社会项目的成效基于2001年至2004年期间里约热内卢第一儿童与青年法庭开展的“家长学校”项目。该分析基于对48名负责18岁以下儿童的家长的监测,这些儿童大多是虐待、暴力或疏忽以及社会排斥的受害者。该研究的目标包括:说明健康促进成效的证据;讨论在宏观不利条件下健康促进成效的概念;识别促进成果可持续性的策略。机构资源包括多专业工作人员、多学科方法、参与式工作坊、家庭个案管理、与公共和私人机构的伙伴关系以及对家庭的志愿者和民间社会赞助。评估基于社会影响指标以及心理社会和背景决定因素。评估方法包括项目监测以及定量 - 定性方法,通过为期3年的纵向评估,包括项目结束后1年的评估。评估显示在“家庭融合”“家庭关系质量”和“人权动员”方面取得了非常有利的结果。诸如“缺乏正规就业机会”等不尽如人意的结果可能与结构因素以及教育、职业培训、住房和正规就业机会等领域需要新的公共政策有关。由奥斯瓦尔多·克鲁兹基金会公共卫生技术开发项目支持的社会行为体在环境管理和住房方面的培训过程,被用作环境教育和健康住房的工具。本研究的目的是构建一个综合的、参与式的环境管理模式。该方法包括对年龄在21岁至50岁之间参与编写关于水质监测的主题学习手册和社区指南的参与者进行培训、研究和评估。参与者的评估强调了培训过程,鼓励他们成为社区环境教育的传播者,并继续学习如何整合各部门以解决问题。潜在健康区网络(RMPS)旨在增加知识并建设能力,以便根据每个地方单位的特点和实践开展行动。RMPS由坎皮纳斯州立大学预防与社会系与泛美卫生组织/世界卫生组织以及社会特殊研究所(IPES)共同开发,其使命是以参与和协调的方式通过不同的市政代表合作构建健康公共政策。该网络为市政当局提供工具,以开展综合项目,将政府、管理人员、技术人员、学术界和组织聚集在一起,构建旨在促进健康和提高生活质量的公共政策。该方法基于社会行为体构建知识和行动网络,激发跨部门和跨地区行动。成果评估基于案例研究、焦点小组、口述故事、文件和图像分析。