• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于人头费的战略思考。

Thinking strategically about capitation.

作者信息

Boland P

机构信息

Boland Healthcare Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 May;51(5):54-8, 60.

PMID:10167296
Abstract

All managed care stakeholders--health plan members, employers, providers, community organizations, and government entitites--share a common interest in reducing healthcare costs while improving the quality of care health plan members receive. Although capitation is a usually thought of primarily as a payment mechanism, it can be a powerful tool providers and health plans can use to accomplish these strategic objectives and others, such as restoring and maintaining the health of plan members or improving a community's health status. For capitation to work effectively as a strategic tool, its use must be tied to a corporate agenda of partnering with stakeholders to achieve broader strategic goals. Health plans and providers must develop a partnership strategy in which each stakeholder has well-defined roles and responsibilities. The capitation structure must reinforce interdependence, shift focus from meeting organizational needs to meeting customer needs, and develop risk-driven care strategies.

摘要

所有管理式医疗利益相关者——健康计划成员、雇主、医疗服务提供者、社区组织和政府实体——在降低医疗成本的同时提高健康计划成员所接受的医疗服务质量方面有着共同利益。虽然按人头付费通常主要被视为一种支付机制,但它可以成为医疗服务提供者和健康计划用来实现这些战略目标以及其他目标(如恢复和维持计划成员的健康或改善社区健康状况)的有力工具。为了使按人头付费作为一种战略工具有效发挥作用,其使用必须与与利益相关者合作以实现更广泛战略目标的企业议程挂钩。健康计划和医疗服务提供者必须制定一种伙伴关系战略,其中每个利益相关者都有明确界定的角色和责任。按人头付费结构必须加强相互依存关系,将重点从满足组织需求转移到满足客户需求,并制定风险驱动的护理战略。

相似文献

1
Thinking strategically about capitation.关于人头费的战略思考。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 May;51(5):54-8, 60.
2
Managing risk in a changing health care system.在不断变化的医疗体系中管理风险。
J Health Care Finance. 1996 Spring;22(3):15-22.
3
The power and potential of capitation.
Manag Care Q. 1997 Winter;5(1):1-9.
4
Capitation revisited: integrated systems learn how to manage care and risk.重新审视人头费:综合系统学习如何管理医疗服务与风险。
Health Syst Lead. 1995 Apr;2(3):4-11.
5
Alternatives to traditional capitation in managed care agreements.管理式医疗协议中传统按人头付费的替代方案。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1998 Apr;52(4):46-50.
6
Rating managed care plans as business partners.将管理式医疗计划评定为商业合作伙伴。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Mar;51(3):41-2, 44.
7
Coping with capitation.应对按人头付费制
Health Data Manag. 1997 Aug;5(8):54-60, 64-7.
8
Managed care and the business of risk management.
Health Care Manag. 1995 Oct;2(1):115-23.
9
Changing paradigms in medical payment.医疗支付模式的转变
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 26;156(4):357-60.
10
Managed health care.管理式医疗保健
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Apr;46(4):742-63.