Suppr超能文献

管理式医疗协议中传统按人头付费的替代方案。

Alternatives to traditional capitation in managed care agreements.

作者信息

Kennedy K M, Merlino D J

机构信息

ECG Management Consultants, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Healthc Financ Manage. 1998 Apr;52(4):46-50.

Abstract

Risk arrangements typically fall into one of three categories: primary care capitation, professional services capitation, and global, or full-risk, capitation. Yet, in light of various disadvantages associated with these three methods, such as high administrative costs and inappropriate levels of risk assumed by providers, many healthcare payers and providers are experimenting with alternative payment plans. These alternatives include contact capitation arrangements, under which specialists receive a capitation payment on a per referral basis; open-access arrangements, under which patients do not need a gatekeeper referral to see specialists; and capitation arrangements with quality and hospital utilization bonuses, under which specialists and primary care physicians receive a capitation payment plus the potential for bonuses based on quality and utilization criteria.

摘要

风险安排通常可分为三类

初级保健人头付费制、专业服务人头付费制以及全球或全风险人头付费制。然而,鉴于这三种方法存在各种弊端,例如管理成本高昂以及提供者承担的风险水平不当,许多医疗保健支付方和提供者正在试验替代支付计划。这些替代方案包括联络人头付费安排,即专科医生按每次转诊获得人头付费;开放式就诊安排,即患者无需通过看门人转诊即可看专科医生;以及带有质量和医院利用奖金的人头付费安排,即专科医生和初级保健医生获得人头付费,外加根据质量和利用标准获得奖金的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验