Crue B L, Kenton B, Carregal E J
Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc. 1976 Jan;41(1):13-42.
The gate theory of pain is criticized at three levels: (1) at the dorsal horn "gate", where pre-synaptic inhibition in the primary afferent endings may go beyond mere reduction of synaptic power at the afferent endings and induce antidromic impulses (dorsal root reflexes) that may modulate peripherally by blocking; (2) central to the "gate", where postsynaptic neuronal repetitive (epileptiform) firing is believed to be an important underlying mechanism in clinical chronic pain syndromes; and, (3) in the periphery, where there is more to input coding than a balance between the ratio of large and smaller fiber inputs. Contrary to the belief of many sensory neurophysiologists, the present authors contend that pattern theory is viable; and that specificity, while important and not to be ignored, should be considered as only a partially evolved refinement superimposed on a basic underlying spatial and temporal patterning of input that probably requires central decoding, which begins in the dorsal horn.
(1)在背角“闸门”处,初级传入神经末梢的突触前抑制可能不仅仅是降低传入神经末梢的突触效能,还会诱发逆向冲动(背根反射),这种冲动可能通过阻断作用在外周进行调节;(2)在“闸门”中枢,突触后神经元的重复性(癫痫样)放电被认为是临床慢性疼痛综合征的一个重要潜在机制;(3)在外周,输入编码不仅仅是大、小纤维输入比例的平衡。与许多感觉神经生理学家的观点相反,本文作者认为模式理论是可行的;特异性虽然重要且不可忽视,但应被视为只是叠加在可能需要中枢解码(始于背角)的基本潜在空间和时间模式输入上的部分进化完善。