Suppr超能文献

确定一项临床活动何时应被归类为需要机构审查委员会审查的研究。

Determining when a clinical activity should be classified as research requiring Institutional Review Board Review.

作者信息

Prentice E D, Gordon B G, Lin M H

机构信息

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-6810, USA.

出版信息

J Extra Corpor Technol. 1997 Jun;29(2):88-91.

Abstract

The boundary between therapy and research may at times be difficult to distinguish, and it is, therefore, important for health care professionals to recognize when a clinical activity should be properly classified as research. Research may be subject to federal regulations which require advance review and approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) in order to protect the rights and welfare of patients who serve as human subjects. This paper will discuss the criteria health care professionals can use to distinguish between therapy, innovative therapy, and therapeutic or clinical research.

摘要

治疗与研究之间的界限有时可能难以区分,因此,医疗保健专业人员认识到何时一项临床活动应被恰当地归类为研究非常重要。研究可能要遵循联邦法规,这些法规要求由机构审查委员会(IRB)进行预先审查和批准,以保护作为人类受试者的患者的权利和福利。本文将讨论医疗保健专业人员可用于区分治疗、创新治疗以及治疗性或临床研究的标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验