• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观点:公共医疗与私人医疗服务:超越口号之争

Viewpoint: public versus private health care delivery: beyond the slogans.

作者信息

Giusti D, Criel B, De Béthune X

机构信息

Matany Hospital, Moroto District, Uganda.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 1997 Sep;12(3):192-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/12.3.193.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/12.3.193
PMID:10173400
Abstract

In most settings, a 'public' health service refers to a service which belongs to the state. The term 'private' is used when health care is delivered by individuals and/or institutions not administered by the state. In this paper it is argued that such a distinction, which is based on the institutional or administrative identity of the health care provider, is not adequate because it takes for granted that the nature of this identity automatically determines the nature of the service delivered to the population. A different frame of classification between public and private health services is proposed: one which is based on the purpose the health service pursues and on the outputs it yields. A set of five operational criteria to distinguish between health services guided by a public or private purpose is presented. This alternative classification is discussed in relation to a variety of existing situations in sub-Saharan Africa (Mali, Uganda, Zimbabwe). It is hoped that it can be used as a tool in the hands of the health planner in order to bring more rationality in the current altercation between the public and the private health care sector.

摘要

在大多数情况下,“公共”卫生服务指的是属于国家的服务。当医疗保健由非国家管理的个人和/或机构提供时,使用“私人”一词。本文认为,这种基于医疗保健提供者的机构或行政身份的区分并不充分,因为它理所当然地认为这种身份的性质会自动决定提供给民众的服务的性质。本文提出了一种公共卫生服务和私人卫生服务之间不同的分类框架:一种基于卫生服务所追求的目的及其产生的产出。提出了一套区分以公共目的或私人目的为导向的卫生服务的五项操作标准。结合撒哈拉以南非洲(马里、乌干达、津巴布韦)的各种现有情况对这种替代分类进行了讨论。希望它能成为卫生规划者手中的一种工具,以便在当前公共和私人医疗保健部门的争论中带来更多合理性。

相似文献

1
Viewpoint: public versus private health care delivery: beyond the slogans.观点:公共医疗与私人医疗服务:超越口号之争
Health Policy Plan. 1997 Sep;12(3):192-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/12.3.193.
2
Reforming health service delivery at district level in Ghana: the perspective of a district medical officer.加纳地区层面卫生服务提供的改革:一位地区医务官的视角
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Mar;14(1):59-69. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.1.59.
3
Public health care under pressure in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的公共医疗保健面临压力。
Health Policy. 2005 Mar;71(3):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.06.002.
4
Private sector joins family planning effort.私营部门参与计划生育工作。
Front Lines. 1989 Dec:6, 13.
5
PPP insights in South Africa.南非的公私合营见解
World Hosp Health Serv. 2003;39(1):2-10, 30, 32.
6
Strengthening health care systems in sub-Saharan Africa.加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区的医疗保健系统。
S Afr Med J. 2006 Jul;96(7):586, 588.
7
The Gateway Paper--health service delivery outside of the public sector in Pakistan.《关键报告》——巴基斯坦公共部门以外的医疗服务提供情况
J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 Dec;56(12 Suppl 4):S66-77.
8
Applying a Total Market Lens: Increased IUD Service Delivery Through Complementary Public- and Private-Sector Interventions in 4 Countries.运用全面市场视角:通过在 4 个国家实施公私营部门互补干预措施增加宫内节育器服务提供
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Aug 18;4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21-32. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00307. Print 2016 Aug 11.
9
[Some immediate results from the integration of family planning into health services and from contraceptive use].[将计划生育纳入卫生服务及使用避孕药具带来的一些直接成果]
Imbonezamuryango. 1990 Aug(18):14-21.
10
Patterns in the delivery of psychiatric care in Saskatchewan 1971-1972 (II). Types of contacts and some patient career characteristics.1971 - 1972年萨斯喀彻温省精神科护理服务模式(二)。接触类型及部分患者病程特征。
Can Psychiatr Assoc J. 1977 Feb;22(1):31-6. doi: 10.1177/070674377702200109.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learnt From the Experiences of Primary Care Physicians Facing COVID-19 in Benin: A Mixed-Methods Study.从贝宁基层医疗医生应对新冠疫情的经历中吸取的教训:一项混合方法研究
Front Health Serv. 2022 Mar 29;2:843058. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.843058. eCollection 2022.
2
[Les médecins prestataires à la première ligne des soins dans la ville de Kisangani en République Démocratique du Congo : vers une typologie].[刚果民主共和国基桑加尼市一线医疗服务提供者:走向一种类型学]
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 Sep 6;13(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2617.
3
Medical heuristics and action-research: professionalism versus science.
医学启发法与行动研究:专业素养与科学
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 9;20(Suppl 2):1071. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05888-x.
4
Towards a multilevel governance framework on the implementation of patient rights in health facilities: a protocol for a systematic scoping review.关于在卫生机构实施患者权利的多层次治理框架:系统范围综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):e038927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038927.
5
Affirmative action, minorities, and public services in India: Charting a future research and practice agenda.印度的平权行动、少数群体与公共服务:规划未来的研究与实践议程。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2019 Oct-Dec;4 (NS)(4):265-273. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2019.062.
6
Towards equity and sustainability of rural and remote health services access: supporting social capital and integrated organisational and professional development.迈向农村和偏远地区医疗服务可及性的公平与可持续性:支持社会资本以及组织与专业的综合发展。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 2;16:111. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1359-9.
7
Building on the EGIPPS performance assessment: the multipolar framework as a heuristic to tackle the complexity of performance of public service oriented health care organisations.基于EGIPPS绩效评估:多极框架作为一种启发式方法来应对面向公共服务的医疗保健组织绩效的复杂性。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 17;14:378. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-378.
8
Integrated care: a fresh perspective for international health policies in low and middle-income countries.综合医疗服务:低收入和中等收入国家国际卫生政策的全新视角。
Int J Integr Care. 2006 Sep 18;6:e15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.157.