Olsen J A
Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Health Econ. 1997 Dec;16(6):625-39. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00010-6.
The paper aims to show how three theories of distributive justice; utilitarianism, egalitarianism and maximum, can provide a clearer understanding of the normative basis of different priority setting regimes in the health service. The paper starts with a brief presentation of the theories, followed by their prescriptions for distribution, as illustrated with their respective preferred points on a utility possibility frontier. After this general discussion, attention is shifted from utils to health. The paper discusses how the recent Norwegian guidelines for priority setting can be understood in the light of the theories.
本文旨在展示三种分配正义理论,即功利主义、平等主义和最大化理论,如何能更清晰地理解医疗服务中不同优先次序设定机制的规范基础。本文首先简要介绍这些理论,接着阐述它们的分配主张,并以效用可能性边界上各自偏好的点为例进行说明。在这一总体讨论之后,关注点从效用转向健康。本文探讨如何依据这些理论来理解挪威近期的优先次序设定指南。