• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲口服抗糖尿病药物的短期成本效益模型。

A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe.

作者信息

Hood S C, Annemans L, Rutten-van Mölken M

机构信息

HEDM Research & Consulting, Mechelen, Belgium.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):317-26. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00006.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-199813030-00006
PMID:10178657
Abstract

A short term (6-month) cost-effectiveness model has been developed to simulate current medical practice and disease progression in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus uncontrolled by diet and exercise. The model is based on decision-analytical techniques and includes probabilities of switching between treatments, the reason for the switch and the most common switch options. Effectiveness and economic measures are the 2 main outcomes. In order to assess effectiveness, we use symptom-free days with acceptable control (SFDACs), which represent each day of treatment without adverse events or symptoms, and with acceptable control of glucose and lipids. For the economic evaluation, only incremental costs incurred directly by a health insurance system are considered. This model should prove useful in the evaluation of new oral antidiabetic agents, since the short term aim of antidiabetic therapy is to provide adequate control in the absence of adverse effects and symptoms (a prerequisite for successful long term treatment). Furthermore, short term analysis provides data for comparing initial investment in drug therapy with potential savings over a longer treatment period.

摘要

已开发出一种短期(6个月)成本效益模型,以模拟当前对饮食和运动控制不佳的2型(非胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病患者的医疗实践和疾病进展。该模型基于决策分析技术,包括治疗之间转换的概率、转换原因以及最常见的转换选项。有效性和经济指标是两个主要结果。为了评估有效性,我们使用可接受控制下的无症状天数(SFDACs),即治疗期间无不良事件或症状且血糖和血脂得到可接受控制的每一天。对于经济评估,仅考虑医疗保险系统直接产生的增量成本。该模型在评估新型口服抗糖尿病药物方面应会证明有用,因为抗糖尿病治疗的短期目标是在无不良反应和症状的情况下提供充分控制(这是长期成功治疗的先决条件)。此外,短期分析提供了数据,可用于比较药物治疗的初始投资与较长治疗期内的潜在节省。

相似文献

1
A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe.欧洲口服抗糖尿病药物的短期成本效益模型。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):317-26. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00006.
2
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
3
Economic model of first-line drug strategies to achieve recommended glycaemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.实现新诊断2型糖尿病推荐血糖控制的一线药物策略的经济模型
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(11):819-37. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321110-00005.
4
Cost and clinical implications of diabetes prevention in an Australian setting: a long-term modeling analysis.在澳大利亚环境下预防糖尿病的成本和临床意义:一项长期建模分析。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Jul;6(2):109-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
5
A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe.欧洲口服抗糖尿病药物的短期成本效益模型。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Dec;14(6):709-10. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814060-00010.
6
Cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes of metformin or insulin add-on therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes.二甲双胍或胰岛素附加疗法用于2型糖尿病成人患者的成本效益及临床疗效
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998 Dec 15;55(24 Suppl 4):S24-7. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/55.suppl_4.S24.
7
A comparison of costs for four oral antidiabetic regimens within a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中四种口服抗糖尿病治疗方案的成本比较。
Manag Care Interface. 2003 Jul;16(7):31-6.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin in overweight patients with type II diabetes (UKPDS No. 51).二甲双胍强化血糖控制在超重2型糖尿病患者中的成本效益分析(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究第51号)
Diabetologia. 2001 Mar;44(3):298-304. doi: 10.1007/s001250051617.
9
Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin vs glimepiride as a second-line therapy added to metformin in Type 2 diabetes in China.在中国2型糖尿病患者中,沙格列汀与格列美脲作为二甲双胍二线治疗药物的成本效益比较
J Med Econ. 2015;18(10):808-20. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1049542. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
10
Cost-effectiveness of metformin plus vildagliptin compared with metformin plus sulphonylurea for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Portuguese healthcare system perspective.从葡萄牙医疗保健系统角度比较二甲双胍加维格列汀与二甲双胍加磺脲类药物治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2014 Jul;17(7):499-507. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.912986. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic model of first-line drug strategies to achieve recommended glycaemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.实现新诊断2型糖尿病推荐血糖控制的一线药物策略的经济模型
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(11):819-37. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321110-00005.
2
Insulin resistance syndrome in children : pathophysiology and potential management strategies.
Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(5):291-9. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200305050-00002.
3
Economic evaluation of pioglitazone hydrochloride in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada.盐酸吡格列酮用于加拿大2型糖尿病管理的经济学评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness comparison of cefepime and ceftazidime using decision analysis.使用决策分析对头孢吡肟和头孢他啶进行成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Jun;5(6):505-12. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405060-00006.
2
Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: a European perspective.药品的经济评估:欧洲视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Sep;4(3):173-86. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304030-00003.
3
Efficacy of insulin and sulfonylurea combination therapy in type II diabetes. A meta-analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20 Suppl 1:31-42. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220001-00004.
4
A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe.欧洲口服抗糖尿病药物的短期成本效益模型。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Dec;14(6):709-10. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814060-00010.
胰岛素与磺脲类药物联合治疗II型糖尿病的疗效:随机安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 12;156(3):259-64.
4
Forum One: Current recommendations about intensification of metabolic control in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.论坛一:关于非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病强化代谢控制的当前建议
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 2):175-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_2-199601011-00019.
5
Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变检测与治疗的成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 2):164-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_2-199601011-00017.
6
United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 17: a 9-year update of a randomized, controlled trial on the effect of improved metabolic control on complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.英国前瞻性糖尿病研究17:一项关于改善代谢控制对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病并发症影响的随机对照试验的9年随访
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 2):136-45. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_2-199601011-00011.
7
The feasibility of intensive insulin management in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Implications of the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in NIDDM.非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病强化胰岛素治疗的可行性。退伍军人事务部合作研究对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病血糖控制及并发症的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 2):131-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_2-199601011-00010.
8
Guidelines for good practice in the diagnosis and treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Report of a joint working party of the British Diabetic Association, the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians, and the Royal college of General Practitioners.非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病诊疗的良好实践指南。英国糖尿病协会、皇家内科医师学院研究部及皇家全科医师学院联合工作组报告。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Jul;27(3):259-66.
9
[Costs and effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of patients with dyspepsia, determined with the aid of a computer model].[借助计算机模型确定的消化不良患者诊断和治疗的成本与效果]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Aug 28;137(35):1767-71.
10
Improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in obese subjects treated with troglitazone.使用曲格列酮治疗的肥胖受试者的糖耐量和胰岛素抵抗得到改善。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Nov 3;331(18):1188-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411033311803.