Colwell J A
Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 2):131-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_2-199601011-00010.
To review the results from the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in NIDDM (VACSDM) and to discuss the implications of the results from this feasibility trial.
A randomized clinical trial comprising 153 men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who remained hyperglycemic on usual pharmacologic therapy. Patients were randomized into two groups receiving either standard or intensive insulin therapy and were followed for 27 months.
Five Veterans Affairs medical centers.
153 men with NIDDM, aged 40 to 69 years, who had hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of greater than 6.55% while receiving sulfonylurea or insulin therapy.
Standard insulin therapy was one or two insulin injections daily. Intensive insulin therapy was done using a stepwise approach: 1) evening intermediate or long-acting insulin; 2) addition of daytime glipizide; 3) insulin twice daily, with no glipizide; and 4) insulin three to four times daily, with no glipizide.
Fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels, retinopathy, lipid and urinary albumin levels, cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia, and body mass index.
In the intensive group, the HbA1c level fell 2.07 percentage points; the mean HbA1c level was 7.3% from 6 months onward. The standard group experienced little change. These changes occurred without significant weight gain and with a very low rate of severe hypoglycemia. Sixteen patients (20.5%) in the standard group and 24 patients (32%) in the intensive group had cardiovascular events (P = 0.1).
It is feasible to achieve excellent glycemic control in men with NIDDM in whom standard pharmacologic therapy has failed. The benefit/risk ratio of intensive insulin management in this patient group is not established and has been made the subject of a long-term prospective clinical trial.
回顾退伍军人事务部非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病血糖控制与并发症合作研究(VACSDM)的结果,并探讨该可行性试验结果的意义。
一项随机临床试验,纳入153名非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)男性患者,这些患者在常规药物治疗下仍处于高血糖状态。患者被随机分为两组,分别接受标准胰岛素治疗或强化胰岛素治疗,并随访27个月。
五个退伍军人事务医疗中心。
153名年龄在40至69岁之间的NIDDM男性患者,在接受磺脲类药物或胰岛素治疗时血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平大于6.55%。
标准胰岛素治疗为每日注射一或两次胰岛素。强化胰岛素治疗采用逐步治疗方法:1)晚间注射中效或长效胰岛素;2)加用白天的格列吡嗪;3)每日两次胰岛素注射,不使用格列吡嗪;4)每日三至四次胰岛素注射,不使用格列吡嗪。
空腹血糖和HbA1c水平、视网膜病变、血脂和尿白蛋白水平、心血管事件、低血糖以及体重指数。
强化治疗组的HbA1c水平下降了2.07个百分点;从6个月起平均HbA1c水平为7.3%。标准治疗组变化不大。这些变化在没有显著体重增加且严重低血糖发生率极低的情况下发生。标准治疗组有16名患者(20.5%)发生心血管事件,强化治疗组有24名患者(32%)发生心血管事件(P = 0.1)。
对于标准药物治疗失败的NIDDM男性患者,实现良好的血糖控制是可行的。该患者群体强化胰岛素治疗的效益/风险比尚未确定,已成为一项长期前瞻性临床试验的主题。