Barr J T, Otto C N
National Education and Research Center for Outcomes Assessment in Health Care, Bouvé College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1998 Mar-Apr;12(2):70-9.
The present assessment of laboratory quality is primarily a qualitative summary process. The objective of our study is to convert a qualitative standards document into a quantitative, weighted scoring system. We selected a laboratory testing standards document, Ancillary (Bedside) Blood Glucose Testing in Acute and Chronic Care Facilities, C30, developed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), as our prototype and used a two-stage, modified delphi technique. Sixty-nine criteria were identified from the C30 document. Using a two-stage, modified delphi technique, members of the NCCLS committee that developed the guideline weighted the relative importance of each criteria. This weighting system then was used to evaluate the quality of bedside glucose testing at the 14 general hospitals located within the city limits of Boston.
目前对实验室质量的评估主要是一个定性的总结过程。我们研究的目的是将一份定性标准文件转化为一个定量的、加权评分系统。我们选择了由国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)制定的一份实验室检测标准文件《急性和慢性病护理机构中的辅助(床边)血糖检测》C30作为我们的原型,并采用了两阶段的改良德尔菲技术。从C30文件中确定了69条标准。使用两阶段的改良德尔菲技术,制定该指南的NCCLS委员会成员对每条标准的相对重要性进行了加权。然后,这个加权系统被用来评估波士顿市区内14家综合医院的床边血糖检测质量。