• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用者付费对不同社会经济群体处方药使用情况的影响。

Effects of user charges on the use of prescription medicines in different socio-economic groups.

作者信息

Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Isacson D G, Borgquist L

机构信息

Uppsala University, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Policy. 1998 May;44(2):123-34. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00009-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00009-8
PMID:10180677
Abstract

This study examined the sensitivity towards increases in user charges for different types of drugs and among different socio-economic groups. It was based on responses by 2008 consumers of prescription drugs to a self-administered postal questionnaire sent to a random sample of 8000 inhabitants in Uppsala County in Sweden. The questionnaire included a question about whether the respondents would use fewer prescription drugs if the user charges increased by a specific amount. The increase in user charges was varied between 9 and 150% in five different subsamples. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the probability that a respondent would reduce consumption of prescription drugs as a function of the size of the user charges increase, socio-economic characteristics and the type of drug used. Results showed that the price sensitivity decreased with increasing age, income, education and self-rated health status. Price sensitivity was highest for antitussives and lowest for climacteric drugs. If the user charges doubled, 40% of antitussives users would reduce their consumption whereas only 11% of climacteric drugs users would reduce their consumption. It is concluded that sensitivity to increases in user charges varied greatly between different types of drugs and between socio-economic groups. The young, those with poor health status, low education and low income are most likely to decrease consumption of prescription drugs when user charges increase.

摘要

本研究考察了不同类型药物以及不同社会经济群体对药费上涨的敏感度。该研究基于2008名瑞典乌普萨拉郡处方药消费者对一份自行填写的邮政调查问卷的回复,该问卷被发送给从8000名居民中随机抽取的样本。问卷包含一个问题:如果药费上涨特定金额,受访者是否会减少处方药的使用量。在五个不同的子样本中,药费上涨幅度在9%至150%之间变化。使用逻辑回归分析来估计受访者减少处方药消费的概率,该概率是药费上涨幅度、社会经济特征以及所使用药物类型的函数。结果表明,价格敏感度随着年龄、收入、教育程度和自评健康状况的增加而降低。镇咳药的价格敏感度最高,更年期药物的价格敏感度最低。如果药费翻倍,40%的镇咳药使用者会减少用药量,而只有11%的更年期药物使用者会减少用药量。研究得出结论,不同类型药物之间以及不同社会经济群体之间对药费上涨的敏感度差异很大。年轻人、健康状况差的人、教育程度低的人和低收入者在药费上涨时最有可能减少处方药的消费。

相似文献

1
Effects of user charges on the use of prescription medicines in different socio-economic groups.使用者付费对不同社会经济群体处方药使用情况的影响。
Health Policy. 1998 May;44(2):123-34. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00009-8.
2
The effects of user charges on the dispensing of prescription medicines: a survey of prescription charge payment in the Wellington region.使用者付费对处方药配药的影响:惠灵顿地区处方药费用支付情况调查
N Z Med J. 1993 Jun 9;106(957):225-6.
3
The impact of user charges on the consumption of drugs. Empirical evidence and economic implications.使用者付费对药品消费的影响。实证证据与经济影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Jun;9(6):478-83. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609060-00002.
4
Income related inequality in prescription drugs in Denmark.丹麦处方药方面与收入相关的不平等现象。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 May;14(5):307-17. doi: 10.1002/pds.1039.
5
The economic burden of prescription drug use among elderly patients in Ponce, Puerto Rico.波多黎各庞塞老年患者使用处方药的经济负担。
P R Health Sci J. 2006 Jun;25(2):149-53.
6
The cost of prescription medicines to patients.患者的处方药费用。
Health Policy. 2000 Jun;52(2):129-45. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00066-x.
7
Pharmaceutical insurance and the demand for prescription pharmaceuticals in Västerbotten, Sweden.瑞典韦斯特博滕的药品保险与处方药需求
Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(1):50-6. doi: 10.1080/14034940410028325.
8
The effects of different kinds of user fee on prescribing costs in rural Nepal.尼泊尔农村地区不同类型用户收费对处方成本的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Dec;16(4):421-7. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.4.421.
9
Impact of prescription charges on people living in poverty: A qualitative study.处方收费对贫困人口的影响:一项定性研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Nov-Dec;12(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
10
Prescription drugs: issues of cost, coverage, and quality.处方药:成本、保险范围及质量问题。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1999 Apr(208):1-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of a torture, abuse and dental anxiety service in Norway: a realist evaluation.探索挪威酷刑、虐待和牙科焦虑服务的背景、机制和结果:一项实际评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07913-7.
2
The abolition of user charges and the demand for ambulatory visits: evidence from the Czech Republic.取消用户收费与门诊需求:来自捷克共和国的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0105-7. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
Recommended drug use after acute myocardial infarction by migration status and education level.
急性心肌梗死后按移民身份和教育程度划分的推荐药物使用情况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;71(4):499-505. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1821-3. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
4
The impact of cost-sharing schemes on drug compliance in Italy: evidence based on quantile regression.成本分担方案对意大利药物依从性的影响:基于分位数回归的证据。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Apr;59(2):329-39. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0528-4. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
5
How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011.医疗服务的自付费用如何影响需求、健康状况和再分配?对1990年至2011年实证证据的系统综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Nov;15(8):813-28. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0526-8. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
Comparison of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors use in Australia and Nova Scotia (Canada).比较澳大利亚和新斯科舍省(加拿大)非甾体抗炎药和环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂的使用情况。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jul;68(1):106-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03410.x.
7
What impact do prescription drug charges have on efficiency and equity? Evidence from high-income countries.处方药费用对效率和公平有何影响?来自高收入国家的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2008 May 2;7:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-12.
8
Differences in pharmaceutical consumption and expenses between immigrant and Spanish-born populations in Lleida, (Spain): a 6-months prospective observational study.西班牙莱里达移民与西班牙本土出生人群的药物消费和费用差异:一项为期6个月的前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 6;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-35.
9
Equal access to treatment? Population-based follow-up of drugs dispensed to patients after acute myocardial infarction in Sweden.治疗机会均等?瑞典急性心肌梗死后患者药物配给的基于人群的随访研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;64(4):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0425-y. Epub 2008 Jan 6.
10
Refill non-adherence to repeat prescriptions leads to treatment gaps or to high extra costs.重复处方的续方不依从会导致治疗中断或产生高额额外费用。
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Feb;29(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s11096-005-4797-8.