• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成本分担方案对意大利药物依从性的影响:基于分位数回归的证据。

The impact of cost-sharing schemes on drug compliance in Italy: evidence based on quantile regression.

机构信息

Department of Economics and Finance, University of Rome Tor Vergata, CHP PCOR Stanford University, Via Columbia, 2, 00133, Rome, Italy,

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2014 Apr;59(2):329-39. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0528-4. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00038-013-0528-4
PMID:24336975
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this article we investigate the causal effect of cost-sharing schemes on compliance with statins in a quantile regression framework.

METHODS

We use the health search CSD-LPD data, a longitudinal observational dataset containing computer-based patient records collected by Italian general practitioners. We exploit a series of natural experiments referring to several introductions of co-payment schemes in some of the Italian regions between 2000 and 2009. We adopt an extended difference-in-differences approach to provide quantile estimates of the impact of co-payments on compliance.

RESULTS

We find that (i) introduction of co-payments hurts residents of regions with worse quality and provision of health care; (ii) within these regions, co-payments were particularly harmful for high compliers; (iii) gender, clinical history and geographic residence are important determinants of compliance among poor compliers; (iv) compliance decreases with the potency and dosage of statins, particularly for poor compliers.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of inefficient health-care provision, co-payments are harmful for drug compliance, and this is especially true for patients who are originally good compliers.

摘要

目的

本文旨在通过分位数回归框架研究成本分担方案对他汀类药物依从性的因果效应。

方法

我们使用健康搜索 CSD-LPD 数据,这是一个包含意大利全科医生收集的基于计算机的患者记录的纵向观察数据集。我们利用了一系列自然实验,这些实验涉及 2000 年至 2009 年间意大利部分地区引入的几次共付方案。我们采用扩展的差异中差异方法来提供共付对依从性影响的分位数估计。

结果

我们发现,(i)共付制度的引入对医疗质量和服务较差地区的居民不利;(ii)在这些地区,共付制度对高依从者尤其有害;(iii)性别、临床病史和地理居住是低依从者依从性的重要决定因素;(iv)依从性随他汀类药物的效力和剂量降低,尤其是对低依从者。

结论

在医疗服务效率低下的情况下,共付制度对药物依从性不利,而对于原本依从性较好的患者尤其如此。

相似文献

1
The impact of cost-sharing schemes on drug compliance in Italy: evidence based on quantile regression.成本分担方案对意大利药物依从性的影响:基于分位数回归的证据。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Apr;59(2):329-39. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0528-4. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
2
Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的处方药费用分担的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 7.
3
Drug compliance, co-payment and health outcomes: evidence from a panel of Italian patients.药物依从性、共付费用与健康结果:来自一组意大利患者的证据。
Health Econ. 2006 Sep;15(9):875-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.1135.
4
Impact of financial burden, resulting from prescription co-payments, on antihypertensive medication adherence in an older publically insured population.由于处方共付额造成的经济负担对老年公共保险人群中抗高血压药物依从性的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):1282. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6209-8.
5
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use.药品政策:封顶支付和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.
6
Cost-sharing payments for out-of-network care in commercially insured adults.商业保险成年人网络外医疗的费用分摊支付
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Dec;25(12):598-604.
7
Cost-Sharing Disparities for Out-of-Network Care for Adults With Behavioral Health Conditions.网络外行为健康护理的费用分担差距:成人视角
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14554.
8
[Can linking co-payment for drugs to evidence on treatment value improve health outcomes and contain healthcare costs?].将药品自付费用与治疗价值证据挂钩能否改善健康结果并控制医疗成本?
Harefuah. 2010 Aug;149(8):524-8, 550.
9
The impact of prescription drug co-payments for publicly insured families.参保家庭处方药共付额的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):261-274. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01125-3. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
Does health insurance coverage reduce informal payments? Evidence from the "red envelopes" in China.医疗保险是否能减少非正式支付?来自中国“红包”的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4955-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to chronic medication in older populations: application of a common protocol among three European cohorts.老年人群对慢性药物的依从性:欧洲三个队列中通用方案的应用。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Oct 5;12:1975-1987. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S164819. eCollection 2018.
2
Excess body weight increases the burden of age-associated chronic diseases and their associated health care expenditures.超重会增加与年龄相关的慢性疾病负担及其相关的医疗保健支出。
Aging (Albany NY). 2015 Oct;7(10):882-92. doi: 10.18632/aging.100833.
3
Using quantile regression to assess disparities in medication adherence.

本文引用的文献

1
Using quantile regression to investigate racial disparities in medication non-adherence.运用分位数回归探究药物不依从的种族差异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 6;11:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-88.
2
Assessing the impact of high deductible health plans on health-care utilization and cost: a changes-in-changes approach.评估高自付额健康计划对医疗保健利用和成本的影响:一种变化中的变化方法。
Health Econ. 2011 Sep;20(9):1025-42. doi: 10.1002/hec.1757. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
3
Cost-sharing and adherence to antihypertensives for low and high adherers.
使用分位数回归评估药物依从性差异。
Am J Health Behav. 2014 Jan;38(1):53-62. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.1.6.
费用分担与低和高依从性抗高血压药物的使用。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Nov;15(11):833-40.
4
Making a case for employing a societal perspective in the evaluation of Medicaid prescription drug interventions.主张在评估医疗补助处方药干预措施时采用社会视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(4):281-96. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826040-00002.
5
Cost-effectiveness of providing full drug coverage to increase medication adherence in post-myocardial infarction Medicare beneficiaries.为提高心肌梗死后医疗保险受益人的药物依从性而提供全面药物覆盖的成本效益。
Circulation. 2008 Mar 11;117(10):1261-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735605. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
6
Evaluation of the prescription and utilization patterns of statins in an Italian local health unit during the period 1994-2003.1994年至2003年期间意大利某地方卫生单位他汀类药物的处方及使用模式评估。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0239-3. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
7
The under-use of statin in type 2 diabetic patients attending diabetic clinics in Italy.意大利糖尿病诊所中2型糖尿病患者他汀类药物使用不足的情况。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2007 Jan;17(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
8
Health care quality, economic inequality, and precautionary saving.医疗保健质量、经济不平等与预防性储蓄。
Health Econ. 2007 Apr;16(4):327-46. doi: 10.1002/hec.1172.
9
The effects of prescription drug copayments on statin adherence.处方药自付费用对他汀类药物依从性的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Sep;12(9):509-17.
10
Drug compliance, co-payment and health outcomes: evidence from a panel of Italian patients.药物依从性、共付费用与健康结果:来自一组意大利患者的证据。
Health Econ. 2006 Sep;15(9):875-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.1135.