Huff-Rousselle M, Lalta S, Fiedler J L
Social Sectors Development Strategies, Inc., Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1998 Apr-Jun;13(2):149-63. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199804/06)13:2<149::AID-HPM507>3.0.CO;2-H.
Stakeholders formulating policies on national health insurance (NHI) in the Eastern Caribbean have circled the abstract concept called NHI like the proverbial blind men explaining the elephant. Definitions of NHI have shifted depending on their perspectives and philosophical leanings, their understanding of the issues, and their degree of influence on the process. Based on NHI feasibility studies, market research, and stakeholder analysis conducted in five countries, this article analyses the policy formulation stage of NHI development in these tiny countries. Given the level of economic development and the existing administrative capacity of the governments, this 'phase one' NHI could be a pragmatic first step in introducing a health insurance component into the social security systems of the countries, and gradually reforming other aspects of the health sector. The article is structured around key questions which help to define the positions and relationships of key stakeholders, and then evaluate NHI plans in terms of economic viability, equity, administrative feasibility and efficiency, cost containment incentives, and political palatability. These are the elements that--in combination with economic and political context--will determine the success or failure of NHI in the Eastern Caribbean.
东加勒比地区制定国家医疗保险(NHI)政策的利益相关者们围绕着“国家医疗保险”这一抽象概念争论不休,就像那句谚语中摸象的盲人一样。国家医疗保险的定义因他们的观点、哲学倾向、对问题的理解以及对这一过程的影响程度而有所不同。基于在五个国家开展的国家医疗保险可行性研究、市场调研以及利益相关者分析,本文剖析了这些小国在国家医疗保险发展过程中的政策制定阶段。鉴于这些国家的经济发展水平和政府现有的行政能力,这一“第一阶段”的国家医疗保险可以成为将医疗保险部分引入各国社会保障体系,并逐步改革卫生部门其他方面的务实第一步。本文围绕一些关键问题展开论述,这些问题有助于明确关键利益相关者的立场和关系,进而从经济可行性、公平性、行政可行性与效率、成本控制激励措施以及政治可接受性等方面对国家医疗保险计划进行评估。这些因素,再结合经济和政治背景,将决定国家医疗保险在东加勒比地区的成败。