Suppr超能文献

[发展中国家医疗保健融资的演变与新视角]

[Evolution and new perspectives of health care financing in developing countries].

作者信息

Audibert Martine, Mathonnat Jacky, de Roodenbeke Eric

机构信息

CNRS, Université d'Auvergne, Cerdi, 65, boulevard Mitterrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Sante. 2003 Oct-Dec;13(4):209-14.

Abstract

Over the last twenty five years, the perspective of health care financing has dramatically changed in developing countries. In this context, it is worth reviewing the literature and the experiences in order to understand the major shifts on this topic. During the sixties, health care policies focused on fighting major epidemics. Programs were dedicated to reduce the threat to population health. Financing related to the mobilization of resources for these programs and most of them were not managed within national administrations. The success of these policies was not sustainable. After Alma Ata, primary health care became a priority but it took some years before the management of the health care district was introduced as a major topic. In the eighties, with the district policy and the Bamako Initiative, the economic approach became a major part of all health care policies. At that time, most of health care financing was related to cost recovery strategies. All the attention was then drawn on how it worked: Fee policies, distribution of revenues, efficient use of resources and so on. In the second half of the nineties, cost recovery was relegated to the back scene, health care financing policy then becoming a major front scene matter. Two major reasons may explain this change in perspective: HIV which causes a major burden on the whole health system, and fighting poverty in relation with debts reduction. In most developing countries, with high HIV prevalence, access to care is no longer possible within the framework of the ongoing heath care financing scheme. Health plays a major role in poverty reduction strategies but health care officials must take into account every aspect of public financing. New facts also have to be taken into account: Decentralization/autonomy policies, the growing role of third party payment and the rising number of qualified health care professionals. All these facts, along with a broader emphasis given to the market, introduce a need for a better management of resources through financing mechanisms. Some major reports from WHO and the World Bank are the landmarks of the evolution on how to approach health care financing: The 1993 World Bank report on investing in health, the 2000 WHO report on health in the world and the WHO report on macroeconomics and health. In this early millenium, there is a general agreement on some major aspects of health care financing such as: Lack of resources for financing health care; cost recovery as a part of any sustainable health care system; health as a public good needing some extended subsidies; protecting people from the burden of disease as a part of financing schemes; equity in relation with the public private mix at the center of many debates; financing as a key mechanism for the regulation of the whole health care system and not only as a resource mobilization; HIV in bringing up new problems clearly shows how all these matters are related. Health care financing is at the heart of ongoing questions on health care reforms. Although developing countries have low insurance coverage and weak modern medical care, they share the same questions as developed countries: How to promote technical and allocative efficiency? What place for incentives? What role for the public sector? How can market and contracting bring results? What progress through stewardship and better governance?

摘要

在过去二十五年里,发展中国家卫生保健筹资的视角发生了巨大变化。在这种背景下,回顾相关文献和经验以了解该主题的主要转变是很有必要的。在六十年代,卫生保健政策侧重于抗击重大流行病。各项计划致力于降低对民众健康的威胁。为这些计划筹集资源的资金筹措工作大多不在国家行政部门的管理范围内。这些政策的成功难以持续。在阿拉木图会议之后,初级卫生保健成为优先事项,但在将卫生保健区的管理作为一个主要议题引入之前,又过了数年时间。在八十年代,随着地区政策和巴马科倡议的出台,经济方法成为所有卫生保健政策的重要组成部分。那时,大多数卫生保健筹资都与成本回收策略有关。当时所有的注意力都集中在其运作方式上:收费政策、收入分配、资源的有效利用等等。在九十年代后半期,成本回收退居幕后,卫生保健筹资政策随即成为一个主要的关注焦点。视角的这种变化可能有两个主要原因:艾滋病毒给整个卫生系统带来了巨大负担,以及与减债相关的消除贫困工作。在大多数艾滋病毒高流行的发展中国家,在现行卫生保健筹资计划的框架内已无法获得医疗服务。卫生在减贫战略中发挥着重要作用,但卫生保健官员必须考虑公共筹资的各个方面。还必须考虑到一些新情况:权力下放/自治政策、第三方支付作用的不断增强以及合格卫生保健专业人员数量不断增加。所有这些情况,再加上对市场的更广泛重视,表明需要通过筹资机制更好地管理资源。世界卫生组织(WHO)和世界银行发布的一些主要报告标志着卫生保健筹资方法演变的历程:1993年世界银行关于卫生领域投资的报告、2000年WHO关于世界卫生状况的报告以及WHO关于宏观经济学与卫生的报告。在这个千禧年初,在卫生保健筹资的一些主要方面已达成普遍共识,例如:用于卫生保健筹资的资源不足;成本回收是任何可持续卫生保健系统的一部分;卫生作为一种公共产品需要一些额外补贴;在筹资计划中保护人们免受疾病负担;公平与公私混合是许多辩论的核心;筹资作为调节整个卫生保健系统的关键机制,而不仅仅是资源筹集手段;艾滋病毒引发的新问题清楚地表明了所有这些事项之间的关联。卫生保健筹资是当前卫生保健改革问题的核心。尽管发展中国家的保险覆盖率较低且现代医疗保健薄弱,但它们与发达国家面临着相同的问题:如何提高技术效率和配置效率?激励措施应处于何种地位?公共部门应发挥什么作用?市场和合同如何能产生成效?通过管理和更好的治理能取得哪些进展?

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验