Suppr超能文献

类风湿性关节炎和骨关节炎中NSAID的选择及管理策略。对英国成本和治疗结果的影响。

Choice of NSAID and management strategy in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. The impact on costs and outcomes in the UK.

作者信息

McCabe C J, Akehurst R L, Kirsch J, Whitfield M, Backhouse M, Woolf A D, Scott D L, Emery P, Haslock I

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, England.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Aug;14(2):191-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814020-00007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are an effective therapy for rheumatoid arthritis, they are associated with significant adverse effects, the management of which imposes additional costs on the healthcare system. Prescribing NSAIDs which have a lower risk of major adverse effects as the first-line NSAID for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis may be expected to lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes and reduce overall treatment costs. This analysis examines data from a published randomised controlled trial of 5 NSAIDs to explore these hypotheses.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Data from a clinical trial comparing 5 NSAIDs were combined with published cost data to construct 2 clinical decision models, reflecting alternative approaches to the management of major and minor adverse effects in the UK.

INTERVENTIONS

The 5 NSAIDs evaluated in the analysis were nabumetone, diclofenac, ibuprofen, piroxicam and naproxen, although only the results for ibuprofen and nabumetone are reported.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The total cost of care per patient receiving nabumetone was estimated to be between 25 pounds sterling (Pound) and 41 Pounds more expensive than ibuprofen. In a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients, there were between 690 and 821 more major adverse effects using ibuprofen than nabumetone. The cost per life-year gained (LYG) from using nabumetone rather than ibuprofen ranged between 1880 Pounds and 2517 Pounds (1995 values), depending upon the management of adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that: (i) prescribing the newer, currently more expensive, NSAIDs will not necessarily lead to cost savings; (ii) the management of adverse effects can have a significant impact on costs; and (iii) the additional cost may be justifiable in terms of the mortality and morbidity gains associated with the new lower-risk NSAIDs.

摘要

目的

尽管非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是类风湿性关节炎的有效治疗方法,但它们会产生显著的副作用,对其进行管理会给医疗系统带来额外成本。为类风湿性关节炎和骨关节炎患者开具具有较低严重副作用风险的NSAIDs作为一线NSAIDs,有望改善临床结果并降低总体治疗成本。本分析检查了一项已发表的关于5种NSAIDs的随机对照试验的数据,以探讨这些假设。

设计与背景

将比较5种NSAIDs的临床试验数据与已发表的成本数据相结合,构建2个临床决策模型,反映英国处理严重和轻微副作用的不同方法。

干预措施

分析中评估的5种NSAIDs为萘丁美酮、双氯芬酸、布洛芬、吡罗昔康和萘普生,不过仅报告了布洛芬和萘丁美酮的结果。

主要结局指标与结果

接受萘丁美酮治疗的每位患者的护理总成本估计比布洛芬贵25英镑至41英镑。在一个假设的100,000名患者队列中,使用布洛芬比萘丁美酮多出现690至821例严重副作用。使用萘丁美酮而非布洛芬每获得一个生命年(LYG)的成本在1880英镑至2517英镑之间(1995年价值),具体取决于副作用的管理方式。

结论

这些结果表明:(i)开具更新的、目前更昂贵的NSAIDs不一定能节省成本;(ii)副作用的管理对成本有重大影响;(iii)就与新的低风险NSAIDs相关的死亡率和发病率获益而言,额外成本可能是合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验