Eversmeyer W, Poland M, DeLapp R E, Jensen C P
Department of Medicine, Browne McHardy Clinic, Metarie, Louisiana 70006.
Am J Med. 1993 Aug 9;95(2A):10S-18S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90391-2.
The comparative safety of nabumetone (1,000-2,000 mg/day) versus diclofenac (100-200 mg/day), naproxen (500-1,500 mg/day), piroxicam (10-20 mg/day), and ibuprofen (1,200-3,200 mg/day) was evaluated in a 12-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled in a 3:1 ratio (nabumetone:one of the four comparator NSAIDs). The incidence of > or = 1 adverse event considered by the investigator to be related or probably related to therapy was similar in all groups. However, significantly (p < 0.02) more diclofenac-treated patients experienced abdominal pain and/or gastritis than nabumetone-treated patients. Naproxen-treated patients experienced significantly (p < 0.002) more dyspepsia as compared with patients treated with nabumetone or ibuprofen and significantly (p < or = 0.001) more nabumetone-treated patients experienced diarrhea than patients treated with naproxen, ibuprofen, or piroxicam. Ulcers occurred in one (0.03%) nabumetone-treated patient versus six (0.5%) patients treated with one of the comparator NSAIDs (p = 0.001). A decrease in hemoglobin > or = 1.5 g/dL occurred in fewer nabumetone-treated patients than in patients treated with diclofenac (p < 0.04), ibuprofen (p < or = 0.04), or piroxicam (p = 0.055). Finally, a similar percentage of patients in all treatment groups withdrew from the study because of adverse events related or probably related to treatment. More (p < 0.001) diclofenac-treated patients withdrew because of elevated hepatic transaminases than patients treated with the other agents. Withdrawal because of gastritis was also noted for more diclofenac-treated patients than nabumetone-treated patients (p < 0.04). In conclusion, nabumetone was demonstrated to be at least as safe as diclofenac, piroxicam, ibuprofen, and naproxen as related to subjective complaints, such as dyspepsia or gastritis. However, more serious events, such as ulcers or meaningful decreases in hemoglobin, seem to occur less often with nabumetone.
在一项为期12周的随机、开放标签、多中心研究中,对萘丁美酮(1000 - 2000毫克/天)与双氯芬酸(100 - 200毫克/天)、萘普生(500 - 1500毫克/天)、吡罗昔康(10 - 20毫克/天)和布洛芬(1200 - 3200毫克/天)的比较安全性进行了评估。骨关节炎(OA)或类风湿关节炎(RA)患者按3:1的比例入组(萘丁美酮:四种对照非甾体抗炎药之一)。研究者认为与治疗相关或可能相关的≥1次不良事件的发生率在所有组中相似。然而,与萘丁美酮治疗的患者相比,双氯芬酸治疗的患者出现腹痛和/或胃炎的情况明显更多(p < 0.02)。与萘丁美酮或布洛芬治疗的患者相比,萘普生治疗的患者出现消化不良的情况明显更多(p < 0.002),与萘普生、布洛芬或吡罗昔康治疗的患者相比,萘丁美酮治疗的患者出现腹泻的情况明显更多(p ≤ 0.001)。1例(0.03%)萘丁美酮治疗的患者出现溃疡,而6例(0.5%)接受对照非甾体抗炎药之一治疗的患者出现溃疡(p = 0.001)。与双氯芬酸(p < 0.04)、布洛芬(p ≤ 0.04)或吡罗昔康(p = 0.055)治疗的患者相比,萘丁美酮治疗的患者血红蛋白下降≥1.5克/分升的情况较少。最后,所有治疗组中因与治疗相关或可能相关的不良事件而退出研究的患者比例相似。因肝转氨酶升高而退出研究的双氯芬酸治疗患者比其他药物治疗的患者更多(p < 0.001)。因胃炎而退出研究的双氯芬酸治疗患者也比萘丁美酮治疗的患者更多(p < 0.04)。总之,就消化不良或胃炎等主观不适而言,萘丁美酮被证明至少与双氯芬酸、吡罗昔康、布洛芬和萘普生一样安全。然而,萘丁美酮出现溃疡或血红蛋白有意义下降等更严重事件的情况似乎较少。