• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The generational equity debate: a progressive framing of a conservative issue.

作者信息

Kingson E R, Williamson J B

机构信息

Boston College Graduate School of Social Work, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 1993;5(3):31-53. doi: 10.1300/J031v05n03_03.

DOI:10.1300/J031v05n03_03
PMID:10186840
Abstract

This article discusses the generational equity debate in the United States--including its origins and the functions it serves. This debate has emerged in the context of concerns over the aging of the population, budgetary crises, growing health care costs, increased poverty among children, growing economic inequality, and declining faith in institutions. By potentially fragmenting support for Social Security and other social programs, the generational equity approach to framing public policy issues may serve the interests of those conservatives wishing to shrink and restructure the American approach to social welfare. However, the possibility exists that this debate could serve also as a forum to advance progressive ideas about universal access for persons of all ages to income and health benefits and employment opportunities.

摘要

相似文献

1
The generational equity debate: a progressive framing of a conservative issue.
J Aging Soc Policy. 1993;5(3):31-53. doi: 10.1300/J031v05n03_03.
2
Entitlements, the deficit, and spending caps.福利权益、赤字与支出上限。
J Aging Soc Policy. 1994;6(1-2):95-118. doi: 10.1300/J031v06n01_07.
3
Social contingencies, the aged, and public policy.社会应急情况、老年人与公共政策。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(2):253-77.
4
Public spending on elders and children: the gap is growing.老年人和儿童的公共支出:差距正在扩大。
LDI Issue Brief. 2004 Nov;10(2):1-4.
5
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
6
Trends in the economic status of the elderly, 1976-2000.1976 - 2000年老年人经济状况趋势
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(3):12-22.
7
[Our children, our future].[我们的孩子,我们的未来]
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Aug;73(8-9):467-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286255. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
8
Informal care substitution: what we don't know can hurt us.非正式护理替代:我们所不知道的可能会伤害我们。
J Aging Soc Policy. 1994;6(4):21-31.
9
The TANF/SSI connection.临时援助家庭计划/补充保障收入计划的关联
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(4):21-36.
10
[Rationing: the royal path in health care?].[医疗资源配给:医疗保健的王道?]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2000 Jul 27;89(29-30):1181-4.