Arispe I E, Bernstein J F
Eval Health Prof. 1996 Sep;19(3):377-93. doi: 10.1177/016327879601900309.
Within a research organization such as the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), the process of evaluating program performance must often be integrated with a larger research and development agenda. The blending of evaluation and program development (research and development activities undertaken to build expertise and knowledge in a specific programmatic area) can both strengthen the quality of a program and enhance the science of evaluation research. This article describes AHCPR's evaluation strategy and highlights evaluation activities for the agency's clinical practice guideline program. A case study is presented to illustrate the unique methodological challenges in guideline evaluation, the creation of new tools and approaches for evaluating clinical quality, and the benefits of linking evaluation research with program development.
在诸如医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)这样的研究组织内,评估项目绩效的过程常常必须与更大的研发议程相结合。评估与项目开发(为在特定项目领域积累专业知识和技能而开展的研发活动)的融合既能提高项目质量,又能提升评估研究的科学性。本文介绍了AHCPR的评估策略,并重点阐述了该机构临床实践指南项目的评估活动。文中呈现了一个案例研究,以说明指南评估中独特的方法学挑战、用于评估临床质量的新工具和方法的创建,以及将评估研究与项目开发相联系的益处。